"Steven Burn" a exprimé avec précision :
> I've been on the 256K package for a few weeks and have yet to find
> something/anything that would justify saying it has "worked fine". I've had
> nothing but trouble (from extremely slow connections to intermittent
> disconnections, to staff that are completely and utterly useless (and liars
> too!!) + lots more besides).
I can only speak as I find.....
I have been with Tiscali about 13 months on their 256k service, Nov
2002 though to the present. During that time their was not not even the
slightest hiccup in their service until July 2003. Since July I have
had one disconnection, since July their newsgroup server has been
pathetically poor at times, since July I have had the occaisional poor
service from their email server though for the past month it has been
fine. Instead of using Tiscali's ng server I use the German university
one. Whenever I have been downloading they have run at full speed
throughout the 13 months. From Nov to July I was actually provided with
a 512K service.
I have also used P2P throughout that time... When downloading from a
good source files have been downloaded at full speed and I have never
had a problem with capping as a result of the quantity of material I
have downloaded.
I agree that their staff privide pathetic service, but then so do most
ISP's working on a shoe string. I would describe myself as regular and
at times meduium to heavy user.
Prior to Tiscali I used NTL which was far, far worse in all respects
and for the most part unusable.
--
Regards,
Harry (M1BYT)...
Remove the 'NOSPAM' in my email address to reply.
Free Amateur Radio Courses:-
http://www.ukradioamateur.org