Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Network Hardware > Network Routers > Time to upgrade to wireless-n router

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Time to upgrade to wireless-n router

 
 
Char Jackson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-21-2011, 02:36 AM
On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:40:32 -0600, bob <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>I'm looking for a wireless NIC.
>
>Bob


Are you open to using a USB device or even a wireless router
configured as a wireless client bridge? The disadvantage of a PCI/PCIe
card is that the antenna is usually located behind the computer where
the signal is partially blocked by the computer itself. The other two
solutions allow you some flexibility in placement of the antenna.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
ken
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-21-2011, 10:59 PM
On 1/20/2011 8:36 PM, Char Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:40:32 -0600, bob<(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm looking for a wireless NIC.
>>
>> Bob

>
> Are you open to using a USB device or even a wireless router
> configured as a wireless client bridge? The disadvantage of a PCI/PCIe
> card is that the antenna is usually located behind the computer where
> the signal is partially blocked by the computer itself. The other two
> solutions allow you some flexibility in placement of the antenna.
>


Rosewill does make a couple of NICs that have cables going to the antenna:
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16833166020
http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16833166060
 
Reply With Quote
 
Char Jackson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-21-2011, 11:59 PM
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 16:59:39 -0700, ken <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>On 1/20/2011 8:36 PM, Char Jackson wrote:
>> On Thu, 20 Jan 2011 20:40:32 -0600, bob<(E-Mail Removed)>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm looking for a wireless NIC.
>>>
>>> Bob

>>
>> Are you open to using a USB device or even a wireless router
>> configured as a wireless client bridge? The disadvantage of a PCI/PCIe
>> card is that the antenna is usually located behind the computer where
>> the signal is partially blocked by the computer itself. The other two
>> solutions allow you some flexibility in placement of the antenna.
>>

>
>Rosewill does make a couple of NICs that have cables going to the antenna:
>http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16833166020
>http://www.newegg.com/Product/Produc...82E16833166060


If I can be nitpicky, I like solutions that place the radio next to
the antenna and the cable goes from the radio to the PC rather than
having the cable between the radio and the antenna. (There's a whole
lot less cable loss in a USB or Ethernet cable than there is in an RF
cable.)

For my tastes, there's too much cable loss in designs like those
Rosewill NICs, but the bottom line is that if you have enough usable
signal, they should still work. If the situation is borderline,
though, they may not work as well or perhaps may not even work at all.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Time to Upgrade Wireless Router DWACON Wireless Internet 3 09-09-2007 05:28 AM
Time to Upgrade Firethorne Wireless Internet 2 04-08-2007 05:58 PM
I take it all back - BT F**ks up 512K - 2Mb upgrade BIG TIME (longand tedious) Linker3000 Broadband 18 10-20-2004 05:59 PM
Wireless router's ping time DI-624 got worse over time PT Wang Wireless Internet 0 12-31-2003 04:35 PM
Sercomm wireless router IP717H - firmware upgrade Nims Wireless Internet 0 09-09-2003 07:06 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11