Will these specs take 1MB

I know the attenuation is 5dB over, but there is sufficient SNR margin to
accommodate the 6-8dB drop when moving from 512 to 1MB.
www.thedragon.co.uk/adsl_stats.htm

On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:25:17 +0100, "Paul Landregan"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> but there is sufficient SNR margin to
>accommodate the 6-8dB drop when moving from 512 to 1MB.

looks to be, also its ignoring more than half the available spectrum !
Be outside BT's limits though, so don't hold your breath.

Phil
--
spamcop.net address commissioned 18/06/04
Come on down !

"Phil Thompson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:25:17 +0100, "Paul Landregan"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> but there is sufficient SNR margin to
>>accommodate the 6-8dB drop when moving from 512 to 1MB.
>
> looks to be, also its ignoring more than half the available spectrum !
> Be outside BT's limits though, so don't hold your breath.
>
> Phil
> --
> spamcop.net address commissioned 18/06/04
> Come on down !

I cant understand this either. Why not spread the BIN's out instead of
cramming them at the bottom. Maybe thats what the firmware has told it to
do.

On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 15:48:54 +0100, "Paul Landregan"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>I cant understand this either. Why not spread the BIN's out instead of
>cramming them at the bottom. Maybe thats what the firmware has told it to
>do.

either its strategy is to make best use of fewest bins, or there's
some horrendous noise / interference / loss at the higher levels.

Phil
--
spamcop.net address commissioned 18/06/04
Come on down !

"Phil Thompson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 15:48:54 +0100, "Paul Landregan"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>I cant understand this either. Why not spread the BIN's out instead of
>>cramming them at the bottom. Maybe thats what the firmware has told it to
>>do.
>
> either its strategy is to make best use of fewest bins, or there's
> some horrendous noise / interference / loss at the higher levels.
>
> Phil
> --
> spamcop.net address commissioned 18/06/04
> Come on down !

Maybe the latter as I am 6.4km from the exchange.

On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 15:48:54 +0100, "Paul Landregan"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>I cant understand this either. Why not spread the BIN's out instead of
>cramming them at the bottom. Maybe thats what the firmware has told it to
>do.

what version - is this the "long distance" firmware or whatever they
call it, for dodgy lines ?

Phil
--
spamcop.net address commissioned 18/06/04
Come on down !

"Phil Thompson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 15:48:54 +0100, "Paul Landregan"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>>I cant understand this either. Why not spread the BIN's out instead of
>>cramming them at the bottom. Maybe thats what the firmware has told it to
>>do.
>
> what version - is this the "long distance" firmware or whatever they
> call it, for dodgy lines ?
>
> Phil
> --
> spamcop.net address commissioned 18/06/04
> Come on down !

No, its the regular version 2.5.5

"Phil Thompson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Sun, 10 Oct 2004 14:25:17 +0100, "Paul Landregan"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> but there is sufficient SNR margin to
>>accommodate the 6-8dB drop when moving from 512 to 1MB.
>
> looks to be, also its ignoring more than half the available spectrum !
> Be outside BT's limits though, so don't hold your breath.
>
> Phil
> --
> spamcop.net address commissioned 18/06/04
> Come on down !

Just got a call from a lovely BT manager called Stacey. By order has been
accepted, and the activation date is the 3rd of November.

So with current SNR margin at 21dB, 6db give 15dB after the re-grade. Still
plenty to spare.

Forgot to update once service was enabled. Hapilly running at 1 Meg. SNR
Margin 13.5 dB, slightly lower that expected but still perfectly acceptable.
Error Rate is around 99.998% again perfectly aceptable.
Stats avalable on my website. www.thedragon.co.uk/adsl_stats.htm

On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:32:52 -0000, "TheDragon" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>Forgot to update once service was enabled. Hapilly running at 1 Meg.

cool. It still doesn't like high fequencies I see :-)

Phil
--
spamcop.net address commissioned 18/06/04
Come on down !