KG0WX <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:
>I currently have an Atheros AR5212A minipci wifi card installed in my
>T23 laptop. I ran my own coax cables to two Linksys 7dbi antennas
>on the back of the LCD. Works OK but sometimes I have to get closer
>to my router, aquire the signal then go back to my desk where the
>signal "holds" better. If I loose my connection, I have to repeat
>that.
You should NOT have to do that. My guess(tm) is that your Linksys
client software is scanning around for a better connection and not
locking onto your router. The scanning is by SSID. Does your router
have a unique SSID? Does your Linksys client software have a
"preferred" SSID? Any possibility of local interference from other
WLAN networks that are causing the disconnects? If so, try a
different channel (1, 6, or 11).
I also question using two 7dBi antennas. These have plenty of gain in
the horizontal plane, but not much going up and down. If your
wireless access point is not on the horizontal plane with the laptop,
the added gain is not being used because it's outside of the antenna
pattern.
>I also have a VERY old Pentium MMX 150mhz PC running a Linksys
>WUSB11 external wifi radio. The two systems' antenna are pretty close
>and the router (WRT54G v4 running DD-WRT) reports about 9 db better
>signal from the laptop.
DD-WRT v23 SP2 ?? or one of the experimental versions? Just curious.
The reported signal levels are not very accurate for absolute levels.
You can use the signal strength to determine if changes in location or
antenna are doing anything useful, but comparing two completely
different devices will not work. However, the differences reported by
DD-WRT are valid. 9dB is a huge amount of difference in signal
levels. However, you're also comparing an 802.11b connection with an
802.11g connection. That's good for a few dB of difference.
>The problem is that while the laptop has better performance, I have to
>aquire the signal in a better location before it'll work at my desk.
Well, an improvement in antennas will work better than an allegedly
better card. You could go to one of the higher power Atheros based
MiniPCI cards from Ubiquiti:
<http://www.ubnt.com>
but that won't do anything if there's a receive problem. You'll get
lots of transmit range, but the receive range will be the same. Don't
bother.
What might be useful is changing the antenna configuration at the
access point. Perhaps a simple reflector will help:
<http://www.freeantennas.com>
>It's
>kinda like a squelch type issue.
Well, you can create such abrupt transitions if you set the wireless
speed from the usual default of "auto" to some specific speed. Is
that what you've done?
>So, are there better minipci cards out there? I googled a bit and it
>seems
>like the Atheros based cards are the best but is there a mod to tweak
>the squelch just a hair?
Atheros is good for no better reason than they cooperate with the open
source driver authors while the other vendors vary from ambivalent to
belligerant. However, methinks you might be chasing the wrong
problem. You should be able to initiate a connection at the same
location that you can normally use that connection. If not, something
is wrong and should be found before juggling hardware. It's likely to
be a problem with whatever you're using.
>OS on both systems is W2kSP4
>
>Thanks for your help!
>
>Ken
--
Jeff Liebermann
(E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060
http://802.11junk.com
Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558