Mark Carver wrote in
(E-Mail Removed). com:
> Martin Underwood wrote:
>
>> Was it failure of the supply to the building (in which case the
>> electricity supply company should bear the cost) or failure of the
>> supply to specific floors/rooms (in which case Telehouse should bear
>> the costs). Either way, I hope Force 9 and the other affected
>> companies take the guilty party to the cleaners... and then buy
>> proper UPSes and emergency generators with the compensation money.
>
> An ISP such as Plusnet should really have diverse power feeds, *and* a
> proper UPS.
Diverse feeds would only help if it was a problem inside the building,
unless Telehouse have got connections to more than one National Grid
substation. A UPS woudl help to tide them over for a little while but a long
term power cut (of more than a few minutes) is better covered by an
emergency generator than a UPS with several hours' battery life.
> Anyway, didn't exactly the same thing happen less than a year ago ?
Probably. They seem to have had a lot of "bad luck" over the past couple of
years: various power cuts, loss of some or all web sites that they host,
loss of email servers and the email data. Etc etc. Up to now I've
recommended Force 9 to my customers who want a good ISP. I'm in two minds as
to whether I can still in all honesty recommend them - even though if I do
so I get 50p/month/customer discount off my own bill! At least so far Force
9 have resisted the "Indian call centre" plague on their support lines.