"Mike Tomlinson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:+(E-Mail Removed)...
> En el artículo <2uNzp.186$(E-Mail Removed)2>, treblesix <mike.666NOSPA
> (E-Mail Removed)> escribió:
>
>
> When you've got off your soapbox...
>
>>The mechanical/electrical connections are not the issue!
>
> They are, actually. I was referring to the suggestion that the OP could
> terminate 6 wires in a single IDC Krone connector, when they are only
> designed for two.
>
> Anyone who took that advice at face value might think it was acceptable,
> for instance, to terminate the wiring for six telephone extension points
> at the IDC connectors on the back of the master socket.
>
> Other posters addressed the issue of trying to connect multiple devices
> to a single network port perfectly adequately, so I saw no need to
> repeat that.
>
>>*That* is why the advice in an earlier post to use a proper
>>switch with proper cables is the best answer
>
> Agreed, and I know that, but that wasn't the issue I was addressing.
> That's a nasty kneejerk reaction, maybe you should consult a medical
> professional?
>
>>Don't they teach this stuff anymore at uni/college ???
>
> I have 26 years experience in electronic engineering, and probably have
> installed and troubleshot more networks, of all types, than you've had
> hot dinners, thank you.
>
> --
> (\__/)
> (='.'=)
> (")_(")
>
>
Well, I have over 45 years of experience in which we knew the
HOWs and the *WHYs*.
The correct HOWS had indeed been previously posted ... but
the WHYs had not. That is the reason for the thread wandering
back into bodging cables and connections.which is not a good
way to go. That is why I made an extremely brief post as to
WHY the proper HOW was the correct way to proceed.
Thats not a soapbox ...its all theoretical/engineering/practical fact.
Happy to hear that you dine regularly Mike ....so do I