Thanks for the response, Robert. You are correct...I did
later discover that we had it still set to per machine,
instead of per user licensing. Once I changed that, it
stopped handing out the per-machine 120-day
licenses...just didn't show that users were using
licenses. As it would turn out, that's because Microsoft
hasn't finished developing the license server for
Terminal Services, so it doesn't show usage...rather it
leaves it up to the administrator to be certain that
he/she has only given out access to the lesser of the
two: the number of users that need access or the number
of licenses owned.
Tom Kemp
>-----Original Message-----
>just fixed the similar issue last week. is it possible
you have per user
>license but you installed per device?
>
>--
>For more and other information, go to
http://www.ChicagoTech.net
>
>Don't send e-mail or reply to me except you need
consulting services.
>Posting on MS newsgroup will benefit all readers and you
may get more help.
>
>Robert Lin, MS-MVP, MCSE & CNE
>Networking, Internet, Routing, VPN, Anti-Virus, Tips &
Troubleshooting on
>http://www.ChicagoTech.net
>This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties.
>
>"Tom Kemp" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
message
>news:1146501c3f56f$8938c580$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> We have just setup our first Windows 2003 Server.
>> Terminal Services and Terminal Services License Server
>> has been installed. 5 User licenses have been
>> registered. However, it shows that anybody that
connects
>> is using a temporary 120 usage license, and not these
new
>> licenses. What are we missing? It does show these
>> licenses available.....
>
>
>.
>