"Jeremy Parr" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed)>...
> "R. Ling" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed) om...
> > Thanks for the suggestions, but I don't think they are causing the
> > problem.
> >
> > I didn't say +15dBm. I said "amplifies rx signal by up to 15dB".
> > There is a big difference between the two. Signals from the antenna
> > are not coming into the AP at +15dBm, they are coming in 15dB higher
> > than they would in an unamplified state. An example would be a weak
> > signal picked up by the antenna - say at -80dBm - would get boosted by
> > 15dB to -65dBm. This is indeed how the amp performs; I've hooked it
> > up to the scope and watched it do just that.
>
> I understand that, guess I wasn't too clear in my description. Where is the
> amp located in relation to the access point and antenna? If your antenna is
> RXing a signal of -20, and getting a +15dbm gain by the amp, your D-Link AP
> is gonna see a signal level of -5dbm. Obviously that is enough to toast the
> RX side.
Hmmm... you have a point there. I'll have to check 1) whether the amp
is smart enough to *not* amplify very strong rx signals (i.e. rx
signals greater than, say, -20dBm) 2) what the loudest signal the
reciever on the 900AP+ can handle without incurring damage is.
> Assuming you have a long cable run, the amp should be up against the
> antenna, not up against the AP. The cable should attenuate the signal enough
> so it won't swamp the RX side of the AP.
This isn't an outdoor amp; it's an indoor one. Unlike the outdoor
models which have a separate injector and amplifier, this is all one
unit. It appears to be designed to be mounted near the AP.
Info on the amp can be found here:
http://www.teletronics.com/tii/produ..._24_1w_in.html
Cheers,
Rik.