![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Can anyone recommend a firewall and anti-virus product that works with 2003 server please? Alan |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
ZoneAlarm Pro 3.7.159 Norton AV Corporate 8.1 "Alan Seunarayan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:eOpCJ#(E-Mail Removed)... > Can anyone recommend a firewall and anti-virus product that works with 2003 > server please? > > Alan > > |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I'd seriously recommend looking at a hardware based firewall. For anti-virus on Server 2003, I'm happy with Trend Server Protect. I even run it at home. "Alan Seunarayan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in news:eOpCJ#(E-Mail Removed): > Can anyone recommend a firewall and anti-virus product that works with > 2003 server please? > > Alan > > |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
I would also recommend a hardware firewall or at least a routers internall firewall. Software firewalls are more trouble then they are worth. As for Antivirus, I live and swear by Norton Antivirus Corporate. It is a great product and when it is configured properly it works like a well oiled machine. "Mr. Grinch" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:Xns943960ACC3388grinchhatespamyucksh@24.71.22 3.159... > I'd seriously recommend looking at a hardware based firewall. > > For anti-virus on Server 2003, I'm happy with Trend Server Protect. I even > run it at home. > > > > "Alan Seunarayan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in > news:eOpCJ#(E-Mail Removed): > > > Can anyone recommend a firewall and anti-virus product that works with > > 2003 server please? > > > > Alan > > > > > |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
"DavidF" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed)>... > I would also recommend a hardware firewall or at least a routers internall > firewall. Software firewalls are more trouble then they are worth. > > As for Antivirus, I live and swear by Norton Antivirus Corporate. It is a > great product and when it is configured properly it works like a well oiled > machine. > > > "Mr. Grinch" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:Xns943960ACC3388grinchhatespamyucksh@24.71.22 3.159... > > I'd seriously recommend looking at a hardware based firewall. > > With a hardware firewall is it possible to grant some applications access to say, port 80 and have it blocked for others? Dom |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
(E-Mail Removed) (Fidtz) wrote in news:(E-Mail Removed) om: > "DavidF" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:<(E-Mail Removed)>... >> I would also recommend a hardware firewall or at least a routers >> internall firewall. Software firewalls are more trouble then they >> are worth. >> >> As for Antivirus, I live and swear by Norton Antivirus Corporate. It >> is a great product and when it is configured properly it works like a >> well oiled machine. >> >> >> "Mr. Grinch" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> news:Xns943960ACC3388grinchhatespamyucksh@24.71.22 3.159... >> > I'd seriously recommend looking at a hardware based firewall. >> > > > With a hardware firewall is it possible to grant some applications > access to say, port 80 and have it blocked for others? > > Dom The answer is "it depends". If you want that level of security, typically you require "stateful inspection" of packets. This kind of firewall often costs more. They will inspect the contents of packets and if they recognize the application sending the packet and if it adheres to certain rules about the packet content, it will allow the packet to go. This requires the vendor to know about the applications you intend to use and program this info into the firewall. Not quite the same as "if netutil.exe wants to use port 9999 then let him do so, otherwise no". |