Router vs. AP

If a router can function as an AP, why do AP's cost more than routers




RBM

RBM wrote:

>If a router can function as an AP, why do AP's cost more than routers
>
>
>
>
Volume.

--
Cheers, Bob

That's exactly how it appears to me. I was wondering if I'm just missing
something

"Bob Willard" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:kK-(E-Mail Removed)...
> RBM wrote:
>
>>If a router can function as an AP, why do AP's cost more than routers
>>
>>
> Volume.
>
> --
> Cheers, Bob

On Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:07:47 -0500, "RBM" <rbm2(remove this)@optonline.net>
wrote:
>
>"Bob Willard" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:kK-(E-Mail Removed)...
>> RBM wrote:
>>
>>>If a router can function as an AP, why do AP's cost more than routers
>>>
>>>
>> Volume.
>>
>> --
>> Cheers, Bob
>
>That's exactly how it appears to me. I was wondering if I'm just missing
>something

Nah, it's pretty much just that simple. In terms of demand and commensurate
volume, it's not hard to fathom a few orders of magnitude more "need" for
routers than WAPs. Pretty much everyone needs a router; darned few need a WAP.

Routers are now simple commodities, and there's blood on the walls for
manufacturers. It's gotten to the point where with a bit of homework one can
obtain a router for not much more than shipping costs. Network providers
often toss in a free router to get a new subscriber; you'll probably never see
one offering a free WAP...