Networking Forums  

Go Back   Networking Forums > Networking Newsgroups > Wireless Internet

OFDMA - PUSC - renumbering

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-17-2008, 01:17 PM
Default OFDMA - PUSC - renumbering



Hi,

In the case of PUSC permutation mode of OFDMA, why do they adopt the
policy of renumbering ?
I searched the internet, but i do not find any specific link/doc that
talks about this in detail.
Any ideas ?

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru


karthikbalaguru
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-17-2008, 04:21 PM
Richard Clark
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OFDMA - PUSC - renumbering

On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:17:48 -0800 (PST), karthikbalaguru
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>PUSC permutation mode of OFDMA


Hi Karthik,

I put the phrase above into Google and it gave me 606 links.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:09 AM
karthikbalaguru
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OFDMA - PUSC - renumbering

On Feb 17, 9:21*pm, Richard Clark <kb7...@comcast.net> wrote:
> On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:17:48 -0800 (PST), karthikbalaguru
>
> <karthikbalagur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >PUSC permutation mode of OFDMA

>
> Hi Karthik,
>
> I put the phrase above into Google and it gave me 606 links.
>


I got the info w.r.t PUSC permutation from http://ieee802.org/16 :-

I find that the PUSC permutation has
1) Outer Permutation and
2) Inner Permutation
Further, These permutations reduce interference .
Cross-interference between neighboring cells is reduced between
neighbouring cells,
w.r.t subchannels.

But, why have they opted for this renumbering scheme to introduce
permutation ?

Thx in advans,
Karthik Balaguru
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-21-2008, 09:13 AM
karthikbalaguru
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: OFDMA - PUSC - renumbering

On Feb 21, 2:09*pm, karthikbalaguru <karthikbalagur...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Feb 17, 9:21*pm, Richard Clark <kb7...@comcast.net> wrote:
>
> > On Sun, 17 Feb 2008 05:17:48 -0800 (PST), karthikbalaguru

>
> > <karthikbalagur...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >PUSC permutation mode of OFDMA

>
> > Hi Karthik,

>
> > I put the phrase above into Google and it gave me 606 links.

>
> I got the info w.r.t PUSC permutation fromhttp://ieee802.org/16:-
>
> I find that the PUSC permutation has
> 1) Outer Permutation and
> 2) Inner Permutation
> Further, These permutations reduce interference .
> Cross-interference between neighboring cells is reduced between
> neighbouring cells,
> w.r.t subchannels.
>
> But, why have they opted for this renumbering scheme to introduce
> permutation ?
>


Thx. I got the answers.
I find my queries answered in http://ieee802.org/16 .

Karthik Balaguru
Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
ofdma, pusc, renumbering

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.