![]() |
![]() |
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Hi Any help GREATLY appreciated I have a medium amount of knowledge about networking!! can get my head round it, but still have a lot 2 learn! Anyway, the problem We are a school in the middle of building work, phase 1 is complete and currently being used by us, with a 100meg ethernet switched network running around it. phase 2 is nearing completion and the network will be extended to there (this MAY be the problem, maybe they are working on adding it and i dont know about it) we have one domain server, a linux box running an OS called Navaho. It has been running since about xmas, currently around 30 pc's on it, all rarely used as there is no internet access until the building is complete, and we are going to train the staff all at once! in my room (the temporary ICT room) i have 2 pc's (used regularly) and 25 toshiba satellite laptops on a wireless network. these go thru the wireless access point, thru a mini switch thing onto the main network these are running windows HOME, but i have used that xteq systems tweaking xp thing to get it to connect to the domain. this has worked fine since xmas until last week, altho i do realise that 25 laptops is a lot to have connecting to one wireless access point i gave a class some image editing to do, taking images off the network about 200k each (did this a few weeks b4, did run slightly sluggishly when all accessed at once at 1st, but was ok), when i tried it, 7/8 pc's accessed the images ok, 5/6 could browse thru them slowly but didnt really get anywhere once cliking on open, and the rest, just did nothing, seemed to hang tried this a couple of times since, and its been even worse,, in office progs, the kids would save their work on H: drive (on the server) adn that was fine , even while the images werent working.. i have my documents set up on the laptops to point to h:\pupil files, and this used to work ok.. now if u try access my docs, or even my computer on the laptops, it will just hang there, with the outline of the window, but nothing inside it, UNLESS you pull out the network card (pcmcia), then it pops up happily but obv no network access this USED to work ok, then started like this last week.. but access thru word etc, was still fine.. now tho, its rare to even be able to browse thru word. or sometimes, some kids will get in ok, but then when they want to save, get an error, or open something else, they get all the folders, but with nothing in them.. the hardwired PCs in my room.. always worked fine until friday then on friday, sometimes had probs logging in, it couldnt validify the password sometimes, sometimes it did.. and altho less rare this week, it has still happened from time 2 time.. i think i have given all the information i have there some points : the pc's/network cards do get knocked about a bit.. they are kids! as far as i can think, NOTHING has changed or been touched..but builders do deny everything!! it seems that one/two laptops on their own DO connect sometimes... i THINK that the laptops still see each other (as windows network) even when they dont see the navaho (another teacher told me that! so dont quote me!) any help/ideas would be greatly appreciated, iether direct to my email or on here also can any clarify my understanding here : 1/ if a laptop/network card was 'dodgy/faulty', it could affect the performance of the laptop network, but not the others because its on a switch? 2/ if a pc was faulty (or its nic), it wouldnt affect the others as its switched? 3/ its more likely to be the navaho network problem, as its affected ALL the laptops at once, and other pc's around? 4/ could it be one or two (or more) machines on the network, pullin the whole thing down once they are turned on? 5/ wireless access point problem? 6/ we are at least 200/300m from any other building, so i dont think there will be any interference 7/ server problem? 8/ cabling fault? i know some of these cross over somewhat, but its starting to confuse me and do my head in!! thanks again Craig |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
"Craig T" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:WPDOa.5414$(E-Mail Removed)... > Hi > > Any help GREATLY appreciated > I have a medium amount of knowledge about networking!! can get my head round > it, but still have a lot 2 learn! > Anyway, the problem > We are a school in the middle of building work, phase 1 is complete and > currently being used by us, with a 100meg ethernet switched network running > around it. > phase 2 is nearing completion and the network will be extended to there > (this MAY be the problem, maybe they are working on adding it and i dont > know about it) > we have one domain server, a linux box running an OS called Navaho. It has > been running since about xmas, currently around 30 pc's on it, all rarely > used as there is no internet access until the building is complete, and we > are going to train the staff all at once! in my room (the temporary ICT > room) i have 2 pc's (used regularly) and 25 toshiba satellite laptops on a > wireless network. these go thru the wireless access point, thru a mini > switch thing onto the main network > these are running windows HOME, but i have used that xteq systems tweaking > xp thing to get it to connect to the domain. > this has worked fine since xmas until last week, altho i do realise that 25 > laptops is a lot to have connecting to one wireless access point > i gave a class some image editing to do, taking images off the network about > 200k each (did this a few weeks b4, did run slightly sluggishly when all > accessed at once at 1st, but was ok), when i tried it, 7/8 pc's accessed the > images ok, 5/6 could browse thru them slowly but didnt really get anywhere > once cliking on open, and the rest, just did nothing, seemed to hang > tried this a couple of times since, and its been even worse,, > in office progs, the kids would save their work on H: drive (on the server) > adn that was fine , even while the images werent working.. > i have my documents set up on the laptops to point to h:\pupil files, and > this used to work ok.. > now if u try access my docs, or even my computer on the laptops, it will > just hang there, with the outline of the window, but nothing inside it, > UNLESS you pull out the network card (pcmcia), then it pops up happily but > obv no network access > this USED to work ok, then started like this last week.. but access thru > word etc, was still fine.. > now tho, its rare to even be able to browse thru word. > or sometimes, some kids will get in ok, but then when they want to save, get > an error, or open something else, they get all the folders, but with nothing > in them.. > the hardwired PCs in my room.. always worked fine until friday > then on friday, sometimes had probs logging in, it couldnt validify the > password sometimes, sometimes it did.. > and altho less rare this week, it has still happened from time 2 time.. > > i think i have given all the information i have there > some points : the pc's/network cards do get knocked about a bit.. they are > kids! as far as i can think, NOTHING has changed or been touched..but > builders do deny everything!! it seems that one/two laptops on their own DO > connect sometimes... i THINK that the laptops still see each other (as > windows network) even when they dont see the navaho (another teacher told me > that! so dont quote me!) > > any help/ideas would be greatly appreciated, iether direct to my email or on > here > also can any clarify my understanding here : > 1/ if a laptop/network card was 'dodgy/faulty', it could affect the > performance of the laptop network, but not the others because its on a > switch? > 2/ if a pc was faulty (or its nic), it wouldnt affect the others as its > switched? > 3/ its more likely to be the navaho network problem, as its affected ALL the > laptops at once, and other pc's around? > 4/ could it be one or two (or more) machines on the network, pullin the > whole thing down once they are turned on? > 5/ wireless access point problem? > 6/ we are at least 200/300m from any other building, so i dont think there > will be any interference > 7/ server problem? > 8/ cabling fault? > > i know some of these cross over somewhat, but its starting to confuse me and > do my head in!! > > thanks again > Craig 1 - If a NIC is 'dodgy/faulty' it won't work on that PC, and that single PC won't have access to anything. It has nothing to do with it being switched. I think the best analogy is with Christmas lights. There are the kind that if one light goes out, all of them go, and the type that if one light goes out, the others stay lit. Well, a network is like the kind that keeps the others lit. The switch just means that it has 100Mbps to give to each port. You have a 4 port switch, for example, so each PC gets 100Mbps access, but the switch can handle up to 400Mbps of activity (although this is simply unacheivable because of overhead), but if you had a 4 port 10/100 hub, you have 100Mbps TOTAL, meaning each port gets 25Mbps, but since this isn't 100Mbps, you connect at the 10Mbps speed, meaning the hub will only get up to 40Mbps of activity. This is all a switch does, gives you the boost from 10Mbps to 100Mbps over a hub. [Switches generally are built into Routers, so a 4 port router would also give 100Mbps access, but would also include access to the Internet for everything connected to it {which can be more than 4 PCs with additional switches/hubs}]. 2 - Again, switched has nothing to with it. There's no 'unswitched networks.' Gives you 100Mbps access through Ethernet cable, and the problem PC stays to itself. 3 - I think the only way the Linux box could be a problem is if you are running some ridiculous sort of hardware, like old pre Pentium-III stuff, or Celerons (at any speed). Your talking about a server here, something with about 60 PCs on it, maybe more, you're not going to get anywhere by running some dumb inherited 1996 hardware. It's quite possible that it can handle 30 PCs, but not 60 at once. 4 - A PC can only 'pull down' the network if it is wireless and is accessing stuff. Being on has nothing to do with it. On is on, but doesn't mean accessing. If it is accessing stuff, then, yes, that could, but only if it is wireless. The Ethernet cable'd PCs shouldn't be affected (if they are then this is a red flag towards your Domain server), but the other wireless PCs should be. 5 - You do have a problem here, possibly. I've never used wireless, but I would think that the access point has a total of 11Mbps (might be 22Mbps for some reason, not sure), but that is shared across all the PCs, like a hub. Now, if you have 25 PCs accessing stuff at the same time, on an 11Mbps connection shared evenly, you can expect each PC to have 0.44Mbps access. That's theoretical, you can probably chop off 25% for overhead, up to 50% perhaps, so now you have 0.33Mbps access. That doesn't seem so bad, does it? Yeah, because 1Mbps = 0.125 MB/sec, you have 1/24th of a MegaBYTE access, which is 42.3KiloBYTES/sec. That is incredibly slow. If you have 25 PCs accessing at the same time, this could only drop down. Odds are the access point could get confused and start dropping stuff until it drops everything. But, like I said, I've never used wireless, but this is what makes sense to me. 6 - Not sure on range, but you should be set, since (I believe), each router has a slightly different frequency or something so that others can't 'listen in' (?). 7 - See 3 8 - Unlikely Good luck ![]() |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
cheers!! its sorted now.. i went to the server and read on the LCD display that it had a load of 90% i thought that didnt sound good, so on the advice of another NG, found out how to reboot and did! load is down to aroun 20% and it works! thanks for all the advice, i am sure it will be useful!! Craig |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
"CJT" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)... > Craig T wrote: > > > cheers!! > > its sorted now.. > > i went to the server and read on the LCD display that it had a load of 90% > > i thought that didnt sound good, so on the advice of another NG, found out > > how to reboot and did! > > load is down to aroun 20% and it works! > > thanks for all the advice, i am sure it will be useful!! > > Craig > > > > > I think it's refreshing to hear about a Linux server that is so seldom > rebooted that its masters have to figure out how before doing so. > > If it were Windows, I suspect rebooting would have been one of the first > things tried. Heh. I might not be good at Linux, but I do know how to shut it down.....and reboot it. Anyways, I guess the other stuff still might apply in the future... |