 |
| Register | FAQ | Members List | Calendar | Links | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
07-23-2007, 04:56 AM
|
Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lieberm
On Jul 19, 12:06 am, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote in
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.e...e614fe3?hl=en& : > Radium <gluceg...@gmail.com> hath wroth: > >On Jul 1, 7:24 am, shawn.cormi...@gmail.com wrote in > >http://groups.google.com/group/sci.e...sg/696d6abf90c... > >> how would u like to change the cell phone industry? > >Digital cell phones should stop using the compression they use and > >start using monaural WMA compression with a CBR of 20 kbps or less and > >a sample rate of at least 44.1 KHz. > Very roughly, the current 8Kbits/sec encoding rate, > compared to your 44Kbit/sec, will only handle about 1/5th the number > of users. Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. The bit-rate of the WMA CBR I described is 20Kbit/sec or less. > >1. In its uncompressed form, the audio must have a bit-resolution of > >at least 16-bit > The encoding resolution is not changed by compression. If you encode > something with 16 bit resolution, and compress it, you still have 16 > bit data coming out. It's the data rate or thruput that changes with > compression. Okay. > >2. The sample-rate of the compressed and the uncompressed version of > >the audio must be the same. > Not possible. If the rate in and rate out are identical, then there's > no compression happening. Yes it is possible and it is compression. The uncompressed audio is a monaural linear PCM at 44.1-KHz-sample-rate with a 16-bit-resolution -- this audio has a bit-rate of 705.6 kbps. The compressed audio is a monaural CBR WMA at 44.1-KHz-sample-rate with a bit-rate of 20 kbps or less. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Yes it is possible and it is compression. Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? Where/when is there any change in sample-rate????????? There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. There is definitely a change in bit-rate. However, that is totally different from the sample rate. Totally. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps In linear PCM audio: BIT-rate = SAMPLE-rate X bit-resolution X number of channels Stereo has two channels. Mono has one channel. 44,100 Hz X 16-bit X 1 channel = 705,600 bps BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. BIT-rate and SAMPLE-rate are two completely different things. Radium 
|
|
#2
07-23-2007, 05:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: glucegen1x@excite.com IS A MOON CRICKET
|
|
#3
07-23-2007, 05:32 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lie
Radium <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:
(1154 lines of drivel easily deleted....) If I proclaim to the multitudes that your ravings are correct and agree to sacrifice a 286 motherboard on the hibachi to the computer gods in your name, will you go away and promise not to darken these newsgroups again? Incidentally, the selective fire setting on your word processor seems to be stuck in full auto. I suggest you switch it to either three line burst or single shot. This may also improve the accuracy of your ravings. -- Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed) 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
|
|
#4
07-23-2007, 06:23 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lie
On Jul 22, 9:32 pm, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote:
> If I proclaim to the multitudes that your ravings are correct and > agree to sacrifice a 286 motherboard on the hibachi to the computer > gods in your name, will you go away and promise not to darken these > newsgroups again? > > Incidentally, the selective fire setting on your word processor seems > to be stuck in full auto. I suggest you switch it to either three > line burst or single shot. This may also improve the accuracy of your > ravings. Look. The reason for my outburst was because you didn't answer my ever- so-interesting questions in http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...361cab7?hl=en& : 1. Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? 2. Where/when is there any change in sample-rate? Now please re-read http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...361cab7?hl=en& and answer the questions in that message!! please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please please
|
|
#5
07-23-2007, 01:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jeff Liebermann!
In article <(E-Mail Removed). com>,
Radium <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote: > On Jul 22, 9:32 pm, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote: > > > If I proclaim to the multitudes that your ravings are correct and > > agree to sacrifice a 286 motherboard on the hibachi to the computer > > gods in your name, will you go away and promise not to darken these > > newsgroups again? > > > > Incidentally, the selective fire setting on your word processor seems > > to be stuck in full auto. I suggest you switch it to either three > > line burst or single shot. This may also improve the accuracy of your > > ravings. > > Look. The reason for my outburst was because you didn't answer my ever- > so-interesting questions in > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...361cab7?hl=en& > : > > 1. Who said anything about 44Kbit/sec? > > 2. Where/when is there any change in sample-rate? > > Now please re-read > http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...361cab7?hl=en& > and answer the questions in that message!! > Hey Jeff, If the rather large check for consulting fees to answer specific questions came through, then you should probably answer his question. Otherwise, I think the R-man is getting a little out of control demanding answers to his question for free.
|
|
#6
07-23-2007, 04:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lie
"Jeff Liebermann" wrote ...
> Radium <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth: > (1154 lines of drivel easily deleted....) > > If I proclaim to the multitudes that your ravings are correct and > agree to sacrifice a 286 motherboard on the hibachi to the computer > gods in your name, will you go away and promise not to darken these > newsgroups again? Or you could plonk him and stop feeding the troll. It would significantly enhance the signal-to-noise ratio of these newsgroups! The troll-feeders are becoming as much a problem as the trolls themselves. GET A CLUE, FOLKS!
|
|
#7
07-23-2007, 04:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jeff Liebermann!
"Kurt Ullman" wrote -
> If the rather large check for consulting fees to answer specific > questions came through, then you should probably answer his > question. Otherwise, I think the R-man is getting a little out of > control demanding answers to his question for free. Your "R-man" is a notorious Usenet troll. Plonk/ignore him. Don't feed the troll.
|
|
#8
07-23-2007, 04:40 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lie
Radium <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:
>On Jul 22, 9:32 pm, Jeff Liebermann <je...@cruzio.com> wrote: > >> If I proclaim to the multitudes that your ravings are correct and >> agree to sacrifice a 286 motherboard on the hibachi to the computer >> gods in your name, will you go away and promise not to darken these >> newsgroups again? >Look. The reason for my outburst was because you didn't answer my ever- >so-interesting questions in http://groups.google.com/group/rec.a...361cab7?hl=en& Ok, so you don't want my proclamation and ritual sacrifice. Your loss. Perhaps a different ploy might induce you to evaporate into a cloud of smog. Ever consider that I might not be able to decode whatever you're asking? Perhaps you haven't offered me sufficient motivation to expound on whatever the long lost subject you're ranting about? Perhaps it's because I might consider the effort a monumental waste of time, exercise in educational futility, and what is commonly known as "feeding the trolls"? Perhaps I'm offended by your massive cross postings for the apparent sole purpose of getting my attention? Of course, there's always the possibility that I don't know anything about codecs and compress, but that's easily solved with a suitable search engine. Instant expert, just add Google. However, none of these obvious reasons is why I'm ignoring you. I judge people by their willingness and ability to learn. Helping such people is why I spend an inordinate amount of time answering questions in newsgroups and mailing lists. When someone shows an inability or unwillingness to absorb information and digest it into knowledge, I ignore them. If I think there's some hope, sometimes I snarl at them. In your case, it's not even worth my effort snarling. Your inability to formulate an intelligible question, inability to stay focused, your repetitious behavior, and failure to appreciate my humor, marks you as a loser, unworthy of my limited time. So, go away. Do some reading on basic electronics, communications theory, compression techniques, established practices, standards, tact, diplomacy, and usenet etiquette. When you've done all this, reformulate your questions into an organized form that can be answered without guesswork or a Ouija board. Then, MAYBE someone else will be sympathetic enough to help you with whatever it is you're trying to accomplish. We return you now to our regular scheduled discussions with my apologies for this brief interruption. -- Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed) 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com Skype: JeffLiebermann AE6KS 831-336-2558
|
|
#9
07-23-2007, 05:02 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lie
"Jeff Liebermann" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)... > However, none of these obvious reasons is why I'm ignoring you. I > judge people by their willingness and ability to learn. Helping such > people is why I spend an inordinate amount of time answering questions > in newsgroups and mailing lists. When someone shows an inability or > unwillingness to absorb information and digest it into knowledge, I > ignore them. If I think there's some hope, sometimes I snarl at them. > In your case, it's not even worth my effort snarling. Your inability > to formulate an intelligible question, inability to stay focused, your > repetitious behavior, and failure to appreciate my humor, marks you as > a loser, unworthy of my limited time. > > So, go away. Do some reading on basic electronics, communications > theory, compression techniques, established practices, standards, > tact, diplomacy, and usenet etiquette. When you've done all this, > reformulate your questions into an organized form that can be answered > without guesswork or a Ouija board. Then, MAYBE someone else will be > sympathetic enough to help you with whatever it is you're trying to > accomplish. Jeff, with your permission, I'll quote that now and again on the usegroup where I'm the donor of " inordinate amount of time answering questions in newsgroups and mailing lists." <G> LLoyd
|
|
#10
07-23-2007, 05:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Liebermann! Jeff Lie
[comp.compression removed]
Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> writes: > Radium <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth: > However, none of these obvious reasons is why I'm ignoring you. If your repeated replying to him is "ignoring" him, then please stop "ignoring" him. Phil -- "Home taping is killing big business profits. We left this side blank so you can help." -- Dead Kennedys, written upon the B-side of tapes of /In God We Trust, Inc./.
|
|
| Tags |
| jeff, lieberm, liebermann |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
