|
||||||||
|
|
#1
|
|
Hi,
There is a main site and two remote offices both connect via VPN back to the main site. Main site has BT 5 static IP addresses assigned - initial ADSL connection is via D-Link 604+ and then traffic is passed to two Netgear prosafe routers which have a static external IP address assigned to each on their WAN port. Each router (FVG318) looks after a separate subnet but only one subnet connects to both remote sites. Both remote sites link back to one of the main site subnets using VPN. One remote has a single static IP address from Demon - a Netgear DG834 makes the ADSL connection and traffic is then DMZ'd to an FVS318. Both routers run NAT which means outgoing traffic is double NAT'd. The second remote site has 5 static IP addresses from Demon. Initial connection is by DG834 - this has one of the static IP's set as WAN port and the remaining IP's as an internal LAN. (This is actually slightly different from BT - BT have the WAN port of the ADSL router assigned by DHCP). Then there is a Netgear FVG318 which has been assigned one of the static IP's and acts as the VPN router. Now traffic from the first remote site back to the main site runs fine and has done for a while. Traffic from the second site however suffers from the black hole problem illustrated at http://suport.microsoft.com/?id=314825 It has been fixed by applying method 3 to the couple of PC's on the remote site. But I was wondering why the second site suffers from this problem and the first site does not. I have ordered a Zyxel Prestige 660H-D1 as recommended by a previous reply - I will have to replace the 604+ as it has been borrowed and hopefully the Zyxel will be a better choice than a Netgear DG34. As the main link is working fine I'd rather not cause any problems! Thanks for any thoughts, Kevin kevin bailey |
![]() |
| Tags |
| black, hole |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|