Complaints

Why is this newsgroup so full of problems and complaints, people
begging for assistance from others hardly more knowledgable than
themselves?

From the repies there's not a single do-gooding 'expert' amongst you.

Is it because the Internet is in the same state as the railways were
in 1825?

Have we to wait 80 years for the mess to sort itself out?
====================================




Reg Edwards

Reg Edwards wrote:
> Why is this newsgroup so full of problems and complaints, people
> begging for assistance from others hardly more knowledgable than
> themselves?
>
> From the repies there's not a single do-gooding 'expert' amongst you.
>
> Is it because the Internet is in the same state as the railways were
> in 1825?
>
> Have we to wait 80 years for the mess to sort itself out?

Were the railways sorted out by 1905 then? What then went wrong?

There are plenty of experienced and helpful people here.

Do you have a question about Broadband? Are you the "do-gooding expert"
you feel is needed here?

Colin Forrester wrote:

> Reg Edwards wrote:
> > Why is this newsgroup so full of problems and complaints, people
> > begging for assistance from others hardly more knowledgable than
> > themselves?
> >
> > From the repies there's not a single do-gooding 'expert' amongst you.
> >
> > Is it because the Internet is in the same state as the railways were
> > in 1825?
> >
> > Have we to wait 80 years for the mess to sort itself out?
>
> Were the railways sorted out by 1905 then? What then went wrong?

WW2 mainly !


> There are plenty of experienced and helpful people here.
>
> Do you have a question about Broadband? Are you the "do-gooding expert"
> you feel is needed here?

Who can tell.

Graham

> Have we to wait 80 years for the mess to sort itself out?

NO, we will let you sort it out!!!

Dave

Eeyore wrote:

>>> Is it because the Internet is in the same state as the railways were
>>> in 1825?
>>>
>>> Have we to wait 80 years for the mess to sort itself out?
>> Were the railways sorted out by 1905 then? What then went wrong?
>
> WW2 mainly !

So the railways were fine between 1905 and 1939 then. Interesting.

On 18/08/2006 at 17:08:55 Reg Edwards wrote :
> From the repies there's not a single do-gooding 'expert' amongst you.

We were waiting for a smart ass like you, you're on.

--
How much to leave the shop and never come back?
Seventy? Eighty? Alright a pound.

Colin Forrester wrote:

> Eeyore wrote:
>
> >>> Is it because the Internet is in the same state as the railways were
> >>> in 1825?
> >>>
> >>> Have we to wait 80 years for the mess to sort itself out?
> >> Were the railways sorted out by 1905 then? What then went wrong?
> >
> > WW2 mainly !
>
> So the railways were fine between 1905 and 1939 then. Interesting.

They were quite good during that period for the most paart.

Graham

> > Have we to wait 80 years for the mess to sort itself out?
>
> NO, we will let you sort it out!!!
>
> Dave
=======================================

I'm just a novice. We'd better make friends with the Chinese and ask
THEM to sort things out.
----
Reg.

Reg Edwards wrote:

> > > Have we to wait 80 years for the mess to sort itself out?
> >
> > NO, we will let you sort it out!!!
> >
> > Dave
> =======================================
>
> I'm just a novice. We'd better make friends with the Chinese and ask
> THEM to sort things out.

Don't expect any help there ! They want us to tell them how to do it.

Graham

On Fri, 18 Aug 2006 19:50:59 +0100, in uk.telecom.broadband , "Reg
Edwards" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

>
>> > Have we to wait 80 years for the mess to sort itself out?
>>
>> NO, we will let you sort it out!!!
>>
>> Dave
>=======================================
>
>I'm just a novice. We'd better make friends with the Chinese and ask
>THEM to sort things out.

Right, so you consider standing for 12-14 hours, unable to move , and
having to wear adult nappies as the loos are totally unaccessible, the
sort of train service you'd like? Hmm....
--
Mark McIntyre