Networking Forums  

Go Back   Networking Forums > Networking Newsgroups > Windows Server Networking

2nd DC traffic overhead?

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-15-2006, 12:52 AM
Default 2nd DC traffic overhead?



Hi,

I have a client with three 2003 servers - one is the DC. As some users
are now in a remote building I will place 'their' server with them (it
runs a financial app).

There is a 2Mb SDSL at both ends by which the users currently connect
(using a router to router VPN).

I looked for details on bandwidth usage for domain Controllers in a
single site but didn't find any specifics.

Given that there are about 30 uses, with 7 in the remote office and
generally light changes to AD can the server be moved as is and probably
be fine or is it preferred to move to separate Site object etc.

Thanks.


aus
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-15-2006, 04:04 AM
Louis Vitiello Jr.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2nd DC traffic overhead?

Hey Aus,

If I understand correctly the server you wish to move is not a DC, just a
file server. If that's the case then you should be fine. The only time the
remote users will communicate to the AD server is when they need to
authenticate against something. Your 2MB line should be okay for that. If I
am mis-understanding your setup I apologize.

--
Louis Vitiello Jr.
------------------------------
MCSE, MCSA, MCP, A+/N+
ERCP XP Pro / Net Concepts


"aus" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi,
>
> I have a client with three 2003 servers - one is the DC. As some users are
> now in a remote building I will place 'their' server with them (it runs a
> financial app).
>
> There is a 2Mb SDSL at both ends by which the users currently connect
> (using a router to router VPN).
>
> I looked for details on bandwidth usage for domain Controllers in a single
> site but didn't find any specifics.
>
> Given that there are about 30 uses, with 7 in the remote office and
> generally light changes to AD can the server be moved as is and probably
> be fine or is it preferred to move to separate Site object etc.
>
> Thanks.



Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-16-2006, 02:31 AM
aus
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2nd DC traffic overhead?

Hi, thanks.

Yes its just a server at the moment, but if I move it I will make it a
DC with GC copy in case the link fails. Even with this I don't think
there should be too much overhead.




Louis Vitiello Jr. wrote:
> Hey Aus,
>
> If I understand correctly the server you wish to move is not a DC, just a
> file server. If that's the case then you should be fine. The only time the
> remote users will communicate to the AD server is when they need to
> authenticate against something. Your 2MB line should be okay for that. If I
> am mis-understanding your setup I apologize.
>

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-16-2006, 03:42 AM
Louis Vitiello Jr.
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 2nd DC traffic overhead?

I don't believe you will have a problem.

Good luck with the move!
--
Louis Vitiello Jr.
------------------------------
MCSE, MCSA, MCP, A+/N+
ERCP XP Pro / Net Concepts

"aus" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> Hi, thanks.
>
> Yes its just a server at the moment, but if I move it I will make it a DC
> with GC copy in case the link fails. Even with this I don't think there
> should be too much overhead.
>
>
>
>
> Louis Vitiello Jr. wrote:
>> Hey Aus,
>>
>> If I understand correctly the server you wish to move is not a DC, just a
>> file server. If that's the case then you should be fine. The only time
>> the remote users will communicate to the AD server is when they need to
>> authenticate against something. Your 2MB line should be okay for that. If
>> I am mis-understanding your setup I apologize.
>>



Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
2nd, overhead, traffic

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:44 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.