Networking Forums  

Go Back   Networking Forums > Networking Newsgroups > Linux Networking

centralized authetication NIS or LDAP

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-15-2005, 10:27 AM
Default centralized authetication NIS or LDAP



Hi,
Here is my case :

server - Fedora - FC2
clients ( total 15 ) - FC2 (KDE as Desktop)

1.Now i want to implement centralized authtication so all user logins
can be managed at server.
2.is it possible to autheticate squid users using NIS?
3.is it possible to store browser book marks ( Mozilla or Firefox)
using LDAP at server?

Can you please provide step by step details or Web links so i can do
it.
Is it better to use NIS or LDAP?

- thanks for your time
- Ravi
http://www.big2all.com/wordpress/



ravi
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-15-2005, 11:05 AM
Davide Bianchi
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: centralized authetication NIS or LDAP

On 2005-05-15, ravi <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> 2.is it possible to autheticate squid users using NIS?


Sure.

> 3.is it possible to store browser book marks ( Mozilla or Firefox)
> using LDAP at server?


Don't think so.

> Is it better to use NIS or LDAP?


Basically it's the same. The only differences is the kind of database
you use.

Davide

--
Get it up, keep it up... LINUX: Viagra for the PC.
-- Chris Abbey
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-15-2005, 10:50 PM
Chris 'Saundo' Saunderson
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: centralized authetication NIS or LDAP

On Sun, 15 May 2005 02:27:45 -0700, ravi wrote:

> Hi,
> Here is my case :
>
> server - Fedora - FC2
> clients ( total 15 ) - FC2 (KDE as Desktop)
>
> 1.Now i want to implement centralized authtication so all user logins
> can be managed at server.


Sure can. Either way will work - PAM to an LDAP backed or NIS/NIS+.

> 2.is it possible to autheticate squid users using NIS?


Yes. YP is apparently the option.

> 3.is it possible to store browser book marks ( Mozilla or Firefox)
> using LDAP at server?



Not sure that's possible. I think you're looking at replicating the
functionality that profiles bring under a Microsoft AD domain function.


> Is it better to use NIS or LDAP?


Horses for courses. I'm more familiar with NIS, but LDAP will work.

Saundo
--
Chris "Saundo" Saunderson (E-Mail Removed)
Unix/CCNA/CCDA Guy Powered by Linux and the Orb.

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-16-2005, 01:27 AM
Wolf
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: centralized authetication NIS or LDAP

"ravi" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) oups.com...
> Hi,
> Here is my case :
>
> server - Fedora - FC2
> clients ( total 15 ) - FC2 (KDE as Desktop)
>
> 1.Now i want to implement centralized authtication so all user logins
> can be managed at server.


Yes.

> 2.is it possible to autheticate squid users using NIS?


Yes.

> 3.is it possible to store browser book marks ( Mozilla or Firefox)
> using LDAP at server?


Does Firefox or Mozilla use LDAP? If so, then you can. It is just a
database.

> Can you please provide step by step details or Web links so i can do
> it.


Google is your friend. Try starting at tldp.org.

> Is it better to use NIS or LDAP?


Depends on what you mean by better.

NIS, NIS+, LDAP (in order of difficulty) can get the job you need done for
centralized user management and much more.

--
Wolf
----------------------------------------------------------------
Please post all responses to UseNet. All email cheerfully and automagically
routed to Dave Null


Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
authetication, centralized, ldap, nis

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.