|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|
I've forgotten much of win98 networking steps.. is it necessary to manually
bind tcp/ip to the adapter? mgm |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
The protocol is automatically bound to the card and the service.
"mgm" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:u#(E-Mail Removed)... > I've forgotten much of win98 networking steps.. is it necessary to manually > bind tcp/ip to the adapter? > > |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Still no luck. The workgroup called WORKGROUP that has an XPpro pc and a
Win2kServer pc can't see the win98 pc. Also, this win98 1st edition (no updates until I can access network) pc can't ping the router. It does a successful ping of the loopback add. so I'm assuming tcp/ip is installed correctly. All hardware, nic, utp cables are fine. This pc has a second partition for yet another win2k server os and all hardware functions perfectly and this os is recognized in the "WORKGROUP". "Rob Elder MVP-Networking" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)... > The protocol is automatically bound to the card and the service. > > "mgm" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:u#(E-Mail Removed)... > > I've forgotten much of win98 networking steps.. is it necessary to > manually > > bind tcp/ip to the adapter? > > > > > > |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Are you getting a valid IP address on that 98 PC?
"mgm" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)... > Still no luck. The workgroup called WORKGROUP that has an XPpro pc and a > Win2kServer pc can't see the win98 pc. Also, this win98 1st edition (no > updates until I can access network) pc can't ping the router. It does a > successful ping of the loopback add. so I'm assuming tcp/ip is installed > correctly. All hardware, nic, utp cables are fine. This pc has a second > partition for yet another win2k server os and all hardware functions > perfectly and this os is recognized in the "WORKGROUP". > "Rob Elder MVP-Networking" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:(E-Mail Removed)... > > The protocol is automatically bound to the card and the service. > > > > "mgm" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > > news:u#(E-Mail Removed)... > > > I've forgotten much of win98 networking steps.. is it necessary to > > manually > > > bind tcp/ip to the adapter? > > > > > > > > > > > > |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
no
"Rob Elder MVP-Networking" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:uWPjZ%(E-Mail Removed)... > Are you getting a valid IP address on that 98 PC? > > "mgm" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > news:(E-Mail Removed)... > > Still no luck. The workgroup called WORKGROUP that has an XPpro pc and a > > Win2kServer pc can't see the win98 pc. Also, this win98 1st edition (no > > updates until I can access network) pc can't ping the router. It does a > > successful ping of the loopback add. so I'm assuming tcp/ip is installed > > correctly. All hardware, nic, utp cables are fine. This pc has a second > > partition for yet another win2k server os and all hardware functions > > perfectly and this os is recognized in the "WORKGROUP". > > "Rob Elder MVP-Networking" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > > news:(E-Mail Removed)... > > > The protocol is automatically bound to the card and the service. > > > > > > "mgm" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message > > > news:u#(E-Mail Removed)... > > > > I've forgotten much of win98 networking steps.. is it necessary to > > > manually > > > > bind tcp/ip to the adapter? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > |
![]() |
| Tags |
| 2000, win98, workgroup |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|