|
||||||||
|
|
#1
|
|
Hi,
About a week ago, one of our laptops has started having problems connecting with the router. The laptop is an inspiron 5100, xp home sp2, and the router is a netgear. The router's a couple years old and doesn't have wpa. The laptop will connect without encryption, but when wep is turned on, it will detect the network but can't connect. No software changes recently, and the router settings haven't been touched since it's been working. The only thing I can think of that might have changed the wireless software is an automatic update. I've tried system restore, but no luck. I reset the router as well, but no change. Any ideas? Thanks hunwalla@gmail.com |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 25 Aug 2005 08:19:16 -0700, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>Hi, > > >About a week ago, one of our laptops has started having problems >connecting with the router. The laptop is an inspiron 5100, xp home >sp2, and the router is a netgear. The router's a couple years old and >doesn't have wpa. Any particular reason you didn't bother to supply a model number for your Netgear router? I really want to know why. It seems that EVERYONE that posts quesions in this newsgroup seems to consider the model numbers of their hardware to be unimportant or unworthy of their time and attention. Is it some fear of numbers that causes a deep psychological aversion? Perhaps you find it necessary to provide an additional challenge to those that try to answer questions? Please don't feel that I'm picking on you as I do this to everyone that fails to supply what hardware they're working with. >The laptop will connect without encryption, but when wep is turned on, >it will detect the network but can't connect. No software changes >recently, and the router settings haven't been touched since it's been >working. The only thing I can think of that might have changed the >wireless software is an automatic update. I've tried system restore, >but no luck. I reset the router as well, but no change. Common problem. The problem is that there are two algorithms for converting an ASCII WEP key to Hex. Windoze XP only supports one of them. If you're unfortunate enough to have incompatible hardware, WEP will fail. To insure maximum frustration, Microsloth doesn't bother to supply any useful diagnostics for encryption key failure. All you get is a 45 second delay while it proclaims "Obtaining IP address" which eventually changes to "Limited Connectivity...". Neither of these brilliantly conceived messages offer any clue that the WEP key exchange failed. The easy solution is to use a Hex key instead of an ASCII key. I do this on all my systems because I'm tired of running into this problem. Yes, the Hex key is 26 characters long, a pain to type, and impossible to remember, but I can't fix that. Try Hex, it should work. -- Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed) 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com Santa Cruz CA 95060 http://802.11junk.com AE6KS 831-336-2558 |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
> Any ideas?
Leave WEP off? |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Hi Jeff,
I'm not home now, so I don't have a model number in front of me, but I'll post it when I get home if you think it will help. I assumed it to be a problem on the laptop rather than the router, so that's the info I provided. Some more info: The connection had been working correctly, until it didn't. There were no software, router config, or system setting changes within at least several days of the problem, though system update does install automatically. The system does connect with WEP off. It does not connect with WEP 64bit or 128bit enabled. I have another inspiron 5160 xp pro sp2 that does connect to the router with WEP on. As for the key, I am using the hex key. I'll repeat, the connection settings - including the key - had not changed when the problem began. For the moment the connection is secured only by a mac address access list. I'll run a few tests tonight. I have a DSL modem/WAP which will use WPA or WEP. I'll try it with both. I'll also try booting with a mepis livecd and connecting to each router router. This should help narrow down the source of the problem. I'll post the results, as well as the router model number. Any other info that might be useful? |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
heh, at the moment, that's what I'm going with
|
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
I know wep doesn't provide much security from real hackers, it's on
mainly to keep the neighbors from digging through our shares, and the current mac solution is probably good enough for that. I'm more concerned that her laptop isn't working correctly, and she might have problems later on if connecting to someone else's network. That and, dammit, it should just work. If I knew why it didn't work, and it was just, say, a cost of the way I'd configured things, it wouldn't be all that critical to fix it. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 25 Aug 2005 16:50:41 -0700, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:
>I'm not home now, so I don't have a model number in front of me, but >I'll post it when I get home if you think it will help. I assumed it >to be a problem on the laptop rather than the router, so that's the >info I provided. Assumption, the mother of all screwups. I've lost count of how many Windoze boxes have had mysterious registry changes after updates, installs, uninstalls, power glitches, hardware changes, and just running programs. However, if you've tried system restore without success, methinks it's a fair assumption that there was no mysterious registry change. Incidentally, one recent issue with encryption failure turned out to be something rather dumb. The customer insisted that they were typing in a Hex key. However, when I finally was able to figure out what they were doing, I found that they were typing in Hex into the ASCII box on the config utility. If your key length is 10 or 26 hex digits, you're doing it right. If it's 5 or 13 digits, you're doing ASCII. >The connection had been working correctly, until it didn't. There were >no software, router config, or system setting changes within at least >several days of the problem, though system update does install >automatically. The system does connect with WEP off. It does not >connect with WEP 64bit or 128bit enabled. That leaves: 1. Mis-typed WEP key on the Dell 5100 client. 2. Wireless Zero Config doing battle with what I'll guess to be Intel Proset utilities talking to an Intel something MiniPCI wireless card. 3. MAC address filtering on the router. 4. IP address filtering on the router. >I have another inspiron 5160 xp pro sp2 that does connect to the router >with WEP on. That means the router is fine. That does NOT mean that the router settings are correct. >As for the key, I am using the hex key. I'll repeat, the connection >settings - including the key - had not changed when the problem began. A few weeks ago, I had a client with a similar problem. Out of nowhere, Windoze XP SP2 decided that her laptop needed a "Network Bridge" installed. Check the "Network Connections" thing in the control panel and see if this has appeared. Anyway, it messed up connectivity rather badly. >For the moment the connection is secured only by a mac address access >list. I'll run a few tests tonight. I have a DSL modem/WAP which will >use WPA or WEP. I'll try it with both. >I'll also try booting with a >mepis livecd and connecting to each router router. This should help >narrow down the source of the problem. Well, that will hopefully eliminate the hardware as the possible source of the problem. However, so much of the Intel Centrino functionality is tied up in software, that I doubt that this will show much, especially since the card does work without encryption. >I'll post the results, as well as the router model number. Any other >info that might be useful? 1. Model number of the MiniPCI card used in the Dell 5100 laptop. 2. Using XP SP2 Wireless Zero Config or Proset to run the card? 3. Proset version number. -- # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060 # 831.336.2558 voice http://www.LearnByDestroying.com # http://802.11junk.com # (E-Mail Removed) # (E-Mail Removed) AE6KS |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:
> I know wep doesn't provide much security from real hackers, it's on > mainly to keep the neighbors from digging through our shares, and the > current mac solution is probably good enough for that. If all you want to do is keep the neighbors from seeing your shares, just don't expose Netbios to the net. Block ports 137-139. -- derek |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed) oups.com... >I know wep doesn't provide much security from real hackers, it's on > mainly to keep the neighbors from digging through our shares, and the > current mac solution is probably good enough for that. That's actually a misconception. Lots of people will tell you that hacking is easy, and will even say that WEP is weak and easily hacked. These are people who have never hacked into anything in their life. The reality is that WEP is fine for most users. The issue with security is whether something is *really difficult to hack or *nearly impossible to hack. I just finished testing many security protocols, and the reality is that there are a lot of steps involved, you have to know Linux (and I mean, *know Linux), you have to be within range of the network and run software for maybe an hour or more. Also, hacking is *illegal, so people will need to be happy with the idea of being a criminal. - JB |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
> That's actually a misconception. Lots of people will tell you that hacking
> is easy, and will even say that WEP is weak and easily hacked. These are > people who have never hacked into anything in their life. The reality is > that WEP is fine for most users. The issue with security is whether Really? http://www.crimemachine.com/Tuts/Flash/wepcracking.html Just download the ISO, burn to CD, boot up and follow the tutorial and crack away. Half an hour if you take a long time. > something is *really difficult to hack or *nearly impossible to hack. I just > finished testing many security protocols, and the reality is that there are > a lot of steps involved, you have to know Linux (and I mean, *know Linux), Follow the tutorial above. > you have to be within range of the network and run software for maybe an > hour or more. Also, hacking is *illegal, so people will need to be happy > with the idea of being a criminal. It's only a problem if caught! David. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| problems, wep |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|