Looking for a stronger wireless network USB adapter...

Hi.

I am looking for a stronger wireless network USB adapter since my
current old D-Link AirPlus DWL-120+ USB Adapter is not strong enough and
not compatible with MacOS X 10.2.8 and Linux (Debian; Kernel 2.6.8; I
know there is a third party EXPERIMENTAL driver). It works OK in Windows
XP and 2000 SP4.

What's the best powerful and not so expensive network USB Adapter to
connect to WAPs at great distances? This D-Link one likes to disconnects
and sometimes cannot pick up a lot of WAPs. I am planning to use the new
one for my old 15" PowerBook G4 1 Ghz (its Airport is very weak),
desktop machines, etc. so I will be switching between computers often
and taking it with me. Linux and MacOS X drivers are important and must
be easy to set up with little compilation and configuration.

Are there any after Christmas sales? I live in Los Angeles county and I
would like to buy from a retail store like Best Buy, Circuit City,
CompUSA, Fry's Electronics, Office Depot, Staples, PC Club, Nexcom, etc.

Thank you in advance and happy holidays!
--
"It is not enough to be busy, so are the ants. The question is: what are we busy about?" --Henry
David Thoreau
/\___/\
/ /\ /\ \ Ant @ The Ant Farm: http://antfarm.ma.cx
| |o o| | Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
\ _ / Please remove ANT if replying by e-mail.
( )


ANTant@zimage.com

On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 17:19:22 -0600, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:

>I am looking for a stronger wireless network USB adapter since my
>current old D-Link AirPlus DWL-120+ USB Adapter is not strong enough and
>not compatible with MacOS X 10.2.8 and Linux (Debian; Kernel 2.6.8; I
>know there is a third party EXPERIMENTAL driver). It works OK in Windows
>XP and 2000 SP4.

Just about anything with a Prism chipset can be bludeoned to work with
OS/X. See:
http://www.mcquitty.net/Thomas/proje...relessOSX.html
Here's a shopping list of MacOS and OS/X compatible hardware:
http://home.earthlink.net/~metaphyzx/Wireless.htm
For Linux, see:
http://www.linux-wlan.org/docs/wlan_adapters.html.gz

>What's the best powerful and not so expensive network USB Adapter to
>connect to WAPs at great distances?

Ignore the price tag initially, as there doesn't seem to be any
connection between quality and price in the wireless hardware biz.

What do you mean by "great distances"? How many miles, furlongs[1],
cubits, chains, or paces do you consider to one "great distance"?

The problem is probably not the USB radio. It's the antenna. The
tiny USB PIFA PCB antennas are just too small to do anything useful at
"great distances".
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com/pic...122/index.html
The left two photos are the antenna.

Basically, you need a bigger antenna or an add on reflector antenna.
A different tiny USB radio is likely to have the same range. USB
radios with 1/4 wave antennas (about 31mm long) work better than the
tiny PIFA antennas.

Try a reflector first:
http://www.usbwifi.orcon.net.nz
http://www.freeantennas.com/prod01.htm
or a coffee can:
http://www.nodomainname.co.uk/cantenna/cantenna.htm
Or a mini-USB can be mounted to a reflector, or put into a can.
http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=175
http://www.usbwifi.orcon.net.nz/
http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q105513C8
http://www.rahul.net/dold/clarence/u...42-800x600.jpg
(Stolen from a posting by Clarence A Dold.)

On the last URL, I'm not sure that bashing a hole in the side of the
coffee can is the right way to do this. Methinks it might block too
much reflected RF from the bottom of the can. Instead, I suggest you
bash a hole in the bottom of the can, dead center, and adjust the
distance between the end of the USB radio, and the bottom of the can
to about 31mm. I'm not sure this will work any better, but it will
only cost you a coffee can to find out.

>This D-Link one likes to disconnects
>and sometimes cannot pick up a lot of WAPs. I am planning to use the new
>one for my old 15" PowerBook G4 1 Ghz (its Airport is very weak),

External high gain antennas for Apple Powerbooks are available:
http://www.quickertek.com/WhipProant.html
http://www.quickertek.com/12pbwhip.html
http://www.quickertek.com/buffalog.html
(and a bunch more...)

>desktop machines, etc. so I will be switching between computers often
>and taking it with me. Linux and MacOS X drivers are important and must
>be easy to set up with little compilation and configuration.

Good, fast, cheap. Pick two.

If you really want a universal wireless contraption, forget about USB.
All operating systems will talk to ethernet. Get a box that can play
wireless client with an ethernet port. WAP54G, DWL-900AP+, etc.
There's nothing unique in the operating system. No drivers, configs,
or installs. There's also no 16ft USB cable limitation. Put it on
your roof if you feel the urge. You can also get ethernet radios with
a built in antenna:
http://www.ydi.com/products/mini-etherant-lr.php

>Are there any after Christmas sales? I live in Los Angeles county and I
>would like to buy from a retail store like Best Buy, Circuit City,
>CompUSA, Fry's Electronics, Office Depot, Staples, PC Club, Nexcom, etc.
>
>Thank you in advance and happy holidays!

[1] One furlong is equal to 220 yards and is commonly used in horse
racing to confuse everyone.


--
Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558

Wowser! Thanks for the informative links!

It seems like there are a lot of lack of drivers and support on non-Windows
platforms, especially on MacOS X. How disappoointing. Since you say the
prices are not important, I will ignore that just to get the OS support.

Based on http://www.salescircular.com/ca/computer/wrlsnp.shtml
(12/27/2004):

Linksys WUSB54G = $39.99 [Best Buy] = 3rd party Linux driver and
no MacOS X driver

DLink WL 54G USB = $39.99 = can't find on D-Link's site
Linksys WL 11b USB = $29.99/$39.99 = can't find on Linksys' site
Linksys WL 108G USB = $59.99 = can't find on Linksys' site
Linksys WL 54 USB = $59.99 = can't find on Linksys' site
Netgear WG111 NA = $29.99 = No drivers for both MacOS X and Linux


Having a reflector is a bit overboard. I don't want have to carry something
that big and I don't really like modify hardwares (not a tool guy).

Is the limited USB radio the same thing in laptops/notebooks that come
with wireless networking?


Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Dec 2004 17:19:22 -0600, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:

> >I am looking for a stronger wireless network USB adapter since my
> >current old D-Link AirPlus DWL-120+ USB Adapter is not strong enough and
> >not compatible with MacOS X 10.2.8 and Linux (Debian; Kernel 2.6.8; I
> >know there is a third party EXPERIMENTAL driver). It works OK in Windows
> >XP and 2000 SP4.

> Just about anything with a Prism chipset can be bludeoned to work with
> OS/X. See:
> http://www.mcquitty.net/Thomas/proje...relessOSX.html
> Here's a shopping list of MacOS and OS/X compatible hardware:
> http://home.earthlink.net/~metaphyzx/Wireless.htm
> For Linux, see:
> http://www.linux-wlan.org/docs/wlan_adapters.html.gz

> >What's the best powerful and not so expensive network USB Adapter to
> >connect to WAPs at great distances?

> Ignore the price tag initially, as there doesn't seem to be any
> connection between quality and price in the wireless hardware biz.

> What do you mean by "great distances"? How many miles, furlongs[1],
> cubits, chains, or paces do you consider to one "great distance"?

> The problem is probably not the USB radio. It's the antenna. The
> tiny USB PIFA PCB antennas are just too small to do anything useful at
> "great distances".
> http://www.LearnByDestroying.com/pic...122/index.html
> The left two photos are the antenna.

> Basically, you need a bigger antenna or an add on reflector antenna.
> A different tiny USB radio is likely to have the same range. USB
> radios with 1/4 wave antennas (about 31mm long) work better than the
> tiny PIFA antennas.

> Try a reflector first:
> http://www.usbwifi.orcon.net.nz
> http://www.freeantennas.com/prod01.htm
> or a coffee can:
> http://www.nodomainname.co.uk/cantenna/cantenna.htm
> Or a mini-USB can be mounted to a reflector, or put into a can.
> http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=175
> http://www.usbwifi.orcon.net.nz/
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q105513C8
> http://www.rahul.net/dold/clarence/u...42-800x600.jpg
> (Stolen from a posting by Clarence A Dold.)

> On the last URL, I'm not sure that bashing a hole in the side of the
> coffee can is the right way to do this. Methinks it might block too
> much reflected RF from the bottom of the can. Instead, I suggest you
> bash a hole in the bottom of the can, dead center, and adjust the
> distance between the end of the USB radio, and the bottom of the can
> to about 31mm. I'm not sure this will work any better, but it will
> only cost you a coffee can to find out.

> >This D-Link one likes to disconnects
> >and sometimes cannot pick up a lot of WAPs. I am planning to use the new
> >one for my old 15" PowerBook G4 1 Ghz (its Airport is very weak),

> External high gain antennas for Apple Powerbooks are available:
> http://www.quickertek.com/WhipProant.html
> http://www.quickertek.com/12pbwhip.html
> http://www.quickertek.com/buffalog.html
> (and a bunch more...)

> >desktop machines, etc. so I will be switching between computers often
> >and taking it with me. Linux and MacOS X drivers are important and must
> >be easy to set up with little compilation and configuration.

> Good, fast, cheap. Pick two.

> If you really want a universal wireless contraption, forget about USB.
> All operating systems will talk to ethernet. Get a box that can play
> wireless client with an ethernet port. WAP54G, DWL-900AP+, etc.
> There's nothing unique in the operating system. No drivers, configs,
> or installs. There's also no 16ft USB cable limitation. Put it on
> your roof if you feel the urge. You can also get ethernet radios with
> a built in antenna:
> http://www.ydi.com/products/mini-etherant-lr.php

> >Are there any after Christmas sales? I live in Los Angeles county and I
> >would like to buy from a retail store like Best Buy, Circuit City,
> >CompUSA, Fry's Electronics, Office Depot, Staples, PC Club, Nexcom, etc.
> >
> >Thank you in advance and happy holidays!

> [1] One furlong is equal to 220 yards and is commonly used in horse
> racing to confuse everyone.
--
"It is not enough to be busy, so are the ants. The question is: what are we busy about?" --Henry
David Thoreau
/\___/\
/ /\ /\ \ Ant @ The Ant Farm: http://antfarm.ma.cx
| |o o| | Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
\ _ / Please remove ANT if replying by e-mail.
( )

Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q105513C8
> http://www.rahul.net/dold/clarence/u...42-800x600.jpg

> On the last URL, I'm not sure that bashing a hole in the side of the
> coffee can is the right way to do this. Methinks it might block too
> much reflected RF from the bottom of the can. Instead, I suggest you
> bash a hole in the bottom of the can, dead center, and adjust the
> distance between the end of the USB radio, and the bottom of the can
> to about 31mm. I'm not sure this will work any better, but it will
> only cost you a coffee can to find out.

The pattern from the DWL-122 is off the face of the assembled unit.
Pointing it in from the bottom of the can wouldn't be helpful.
Blocking 1/10th of the surface area of the reflector on the backside of
the usb dongle probably doesn't make much difference.

---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8-122.5

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 18:14:21 +0000 (UTC),
(E-Mail Removed) wrote:

>Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>> http://makeashorterlink.com/?Q105513C8
>> http://www.rahul.net/dold/clarence/u...42-800x600.jpg
>
>> On the last URL, I'm not sure that bashing a hole in the side of the
>> coffee can is the right way to do this. Methinks it might block too
>> much reflected RF from the bottom of the can. Instead, I suggest you
>> bash a hole in the bottom of the can, dead center, and adjust the
>> distance between the end of the USB radio, and the bottom of the can
>> to about 31mm. I'm not sure this will work any better, but it will
>> only cost you a coffee can to find out.

>The pattern from the DWL-122 is off the face of the assembled unit.

Agreed. Most of the RF comes off from the direction of the top of the
DWL-122 (side with name and flashing LED's). However, it's anything
but directional. When I tinkered with mine in "free space", I found
very little difference in signal level pointing inline with the
dongle, than at the alleged maximum RF point. There was a rather
large drop towards the bottom of the unit, which would be expected
from the shielding of the circuit board. Basically, as the antenna
shrinks in size, it starts to act more like a point source (isotropic)
radiator. My guess(tm) is that the pattern is more like a sphere,
with a big dent in the direction of the bottom and in the direction of
the cable. If I feed ambitious, I'll see if I can concoct a PIFA NEC2
model and play with the results.

>Pointing it in from the bottom of the can wouldn't be helpful.
>Blocking 1/10th of the surface area of the reflector on the backside of
>the usb dongle probably doesn't make much difference.

As I said, I'm not sure it will work any better coming in from the
bottom. 10% is about 1dB which is probably not worth worrying about.
However, the height above the base reflector is important and does
make a difference in both pattern and gain. The ability to adjust
this height is much easier with a hole in the bottom, than one in the
side. In any case, it will only cost one coffee can to find out.


--
Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 11:05:55 -0600, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:

>Having a reflector is a bit overboard. I don't want have to carry something
>that big and I don't really like modify hardwares (not a tool guy).

Learn by Destroying perhaps? The reflector can be quite portable. A
pair of hinged flat plate reflectors in the shape of a book is quite
portable. When deployed, it acts like a corner reflector. I wouldn't
use one in a crowded coffee shop, but it's idea for sitting under a
tree and connecting to a distant access point.

>Is the limited USB radio the same thing in laptops/notebooks that come
>with wireless networking?

I don't understand the question. Looks like you left out a few key
words.

Also, you never did answer my question. How far is your "great
distance"? It may not be possible if it's too far.



--
Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558

Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> Agreed. Most of the RF comes off from the direction of the top of the
> DWL-122 (side with name and flashing LED's). However, it's anything
> but directional. When I tinkered with mine in "free space", I found

I think it is quite directional. I had some signal off the point, very
little off the back. Most off the face. I didn't check the cable end. I
had mine stuck on the end of a wooden dowel, holding it above my head,
rotating, and then pointing toward the WAP.

> However, the height above the base reflector is important and does
> make a difference in both pattern and gain. The ability to adjust
> this height is much easier with a hole in the bottom, than one in the
> side. In any case, it will only cost one coffee can to find out.

The fixed height of the dongle attached the way that I have it is
immutable. But changing the diameter of the can has the apparent effect of
moving it more or less off center in the can. If it is more waveguide than
reflector, this is useful.

I tried a little slide screen for repositioning my side mount at different
distances from the bottom, and didn't find much variation. I thought it
was better at over two inches, instead of the calulated 1.7", but later
review of the Netstumbler log showed some fluctuations that I hadn't
noticed the first time. I think sloppy angling inside the can has as much
deleterious effect as bad distance from the reflective bottom.

Sticking the USB connector of the dongle through the can and using the
cable attachment as a clamp of sorts is so easy. A solid mount at some
point along the body would be more difficult.

---
Clarence A Dold - Hidden Valley (Lake County) CA USA 38.8-122.5

Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 11:05:55 -0600, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:

> >Having a reflector is a bit overboard. I don't want have to carry something
> >that big and I don't really like modify hardwares (not a tool guy).

> Learn by Destroying perhaps? The reflector can be quite portable. A
> pair of hinged flat plate reflectors in the shape of a book is quite
> portable. When deployed, it acts like a corner reflector. I wouldn't
> use one in a crowded coffee shop, but it's idea for sitting under a
> tree and connecting to a distant access point.

I don't like breaking expensive stuff. Maybe when I don't care about
the hardwares!


> >Is the limited USB radio the same thing in laptops/notebooks that come
> >with wireless networking?

> I don't understand the question. Looks like you left out a few key
> words.

I meant to say if the wireless network devices in laptops have limited
USB radio or are they strong in distance reach and stability?


> Also, you never did answer my question. How far is your "great
> distance"? It may not be possible if it's too far.

Sorry, far enough that it can go. I don't know how far my D-Link goes.
I cannot find the distance specifications for D-Link AirPlus DWL-120+ USB
adapter. PowerBook G4's Airport is definitely too weak.
--
"It is not enough to be busy, so are the ants. The question is: what are we busy about?" --Henry
David Thoreau
/\___/\
/ /\ /\ \ Ant @ The Ant Farm: http://antfarm.ma.cx
| |o o| | Ant's Quality Foraged Links: http://aqfl.net
\ _ / Please remove ANT if replying by e-mail.
( )

On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 21:41:54 -0600, (E-Mail Removed) wrote:

>I meant to say if the wireless network devices in laptops have limited
>USB radio or are they strong in distance reach and stability?

No, there's nothing in the laptop that would limit the performance of
either built in or external radios. The major limitations on
performance are (in order):
1. Antenna
2. Receiver sensitivity
3. Transmitter output
4. Firmware and drivers
There is also a tradeoff between speed and range. Higher speeds
causes more data errors. The radios will reduce the speed to keep the
bit error rate (BER) down to a tolerable level. I don't wanna go into
detail, but problems with any of the 4 items will reduce range and/or
performance. The problem with most USB dongle size radios is the tiny
antenna. The rx sensitivity and tx power are also somewhat limited by
the power source. With a proper antenna, they'll do as well as any
client radio.

>> Also, you never did answer my question. How far is your "great
>> distance"? It may not be possible if it's too far.

>Sorry, far enough that it can go. I don't know how far my D-Link goes.
>I cannot find the distance specifications for D-Link AirPlus DWL-120+ USB
>adapter. PowerBook G4's Airport is definitely too weak.

About 100ft if you have line of sight without much difficulty. 300ft
max with a bit of antenna gain.

--
Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558