|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|
I have a 512 line which shows SNR varying between 2 (daytime) and 19
(during night) the low SNR figure believed to be caused by local interference (the last 100 metres of the line is carried over a college campus internal phone wiring). Would dropping the line speed to 256 make a significant difference in particular reducing the number of diconnections. JP John P |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:25:18 +0000, John P wrote:
> I have a 512 line which shows SNR varying between 2 (daytime) and 19 > (during night) the low SNR figure believed to be caused by local > interference (the last 100 metres of the line is carried over a college > campus internal phone wiring). Would dropping the line speed to 256 make a > significant difference in particular reducing the number of diconnections. I dont know if there are any genuine 256k services. When I had a 256k account it was a rate-limited 512k line. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Bob wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Mar 2006 18:25:18 +0000, John P wrote: > >> I have a 512 line which shows SNR varying between 2 (daytime) and 19 >> (during night) the low SNR figure believed to be caused by local >> interference (the last 100 metres of the line is carried over a college >> campus internal phone wiring). Would dropping the line speed to 256 make a >> significant difference in particular reducing the number of diconnections. > > I dont know if there are any genuine 256k services. When I had a 256k > account it was a rate-limited 512k line. Zen (the ISP in this case) say their 256 service does sync at 256. JP |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"John P" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)... >I have a 512 line which shows SNR varying between 2 (daytime) and 19 >(during night) the low SNR figure believed to be caused by local >interference (the last 100 metres of the line is carried over a college >campus internal phone wiring). Would dropping the line speed to 256 make a >significant difference in particular reducing the number of diconnections. > > JP It worked in my case - switching from 512k to 256k with Zen brought my connection from hardly-ever working to almost-always working. I am on a long line, with an indicated 63 dB of attenuation and a downstream noise margin usually between 2 and 9 dB at 256k. Router is a Netgear DG834. TM |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
> Zen (the ISP in this case) say their 256 service does sync at 256.
The ZEN service is a true Home250 service and Sync's at the speed as you have stated. Most of the other ISP's aren't offering this BTW product. Phill |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:54:15 +0000, P H wrote:
>> Zen (the ISP in this case) say their 256 service does sync at 256. > > The ZEN service is a true Home250 service and Sync's at the speed as you > have stated. Most of the other ISP's aren't offering this BTW product. Is there any particular reason why Zen can do this, and other BT-based ISPs don't (or didn't)? |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Bob" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news (E-Mail Removed) lid...> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:54:15 +0000, P H wrote: > Is there any particular reason why Zen can do this, and other BT-based > ISPs don't (or didn't)? No ! |
![]() |
| Tags |
| 256, dropping, line, poor, snr, speed |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|