TCP/IQ utility

Hi.

Has anyone here used this line speed test utility? If so, what's the general
opinion of it?

My NB1300+4 reports my connection speeds as 890/6100 whereas the TCP/IQ
utility reports 630/4100. Is TCP/IQ known for giving misleading readings at
all?

Thanks.




Spammy Sammy

"Spammy Sammy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
news:1125414384.782796@teuthos:

> My NB1300+4 reports my connection speeds as 890/6100 whereas the
> TCP/IQ utility reports 630/4100. Is TCP/IQ known for giving misleading
> readings at all?

The former is your connection speed. The latter is your throughput?

--
Phil
http://www.philipchung.co.uk/

"Phil" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:Xns96C2A415523BCpelhamnet@127.0.0.1...
> "Spammy Sammy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
> news:1125414384.782796@teuthos:
>
> > My NB1300+4 reports my connection speeds as 890/6100 whereas the
> > TCP/IQ utility reports 630/4100. Is TCP/IQ known for giving misleading
> > readings at all?
>
> The former is your connection speed. The latter is your throughput?
>
Hi.
Maybe a daft q, but what's the difference between connection speed and
throughput?

Spammy wrote on Wed, 31 Aug 2005 01:32:17 +0930:

>
> "Phil" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:Xns96C2A415523BCpelhamnet@127.0.0.1...
>> "Spammy Sammy" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>> news:1125414384.782796@teuthos:
>>
>>> My NB1300+4 reports my connection speeds as 890/6100 whereas the
>>> TCP/IQ utility reports 630/4100. Is TCP/IQ known for giving misleading
>>> readings at all?
>>
>> The former is your connection speed. The latter is your throughput?
>>
> Hi.
> Maybe a daft q, but what's the difference between connection speed and
> throughput?
>

One is the speed at which your router is sync'd to the equipment at the
exchange, and is the theoretical maximum data transfer rate. The real
throughput is what you can actually achieve based on packet overheads,
retransmissions due to errors or timeouts, and any throttling in place past
the exchange connection point.

Dan

Spammy wrote on Wed, 31 Aug 2005 00:33:46 +0930:

> Hi.
>
> Has anyone here used this line speed test utility? If so, what's the
> general opinion of it?
>
> My NB1300+4 reports my connection speeds as 890/6100 whereas the TCP/IQ
> utility reports 630/4100. Is TCP/IQ known for giving misleading readings
> at all?

I just gave it a run on the Easynet 2Mbps DSL line here at work.
ADSLGuide.org.uk test shows 1889/1656, which isn't far off. TCP/IQ show
532/343.

The problem with any speed test is that it doesn't take into account any
bottlenecks between your PC and the testing site. Looking at my own figures
I'd say there's a bottleneck somewhere, and a traceroute reveals a round
trip of 121ms to www.tcpiq.com compared to only 15ms to www.adslguide.org.uk
, with the spike to tcpip.com in the link between Easynet and Global
Crossing.

Dan

Spack wrote to Spammy Sammy on Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:20:48 +0100:

> I just gave it a run on the Easynet 2Mbps DSL line here at work.

BTW, that's SDSL, not ADSL

Dan

Spammy Sammy wrote:

>>The former is your connection speed. The latter is your throughput?
>>
>
> Hi.
> Maybe a daft q, but what's the difference between connection speed and
> throughput?

Someone calling himself "Spammy Sammy" needs to ask that?

<Boggle!>

--

Brian Morrison

please observe reply-to address