|
||||||||
|
|
#1
|
|
Hello I was wondering if anyone could help me. I am interested in gettin Bulldog Broadband (inc line rental). Does the 18866 service (or 080 170 7788 alternative number) work with this company? Many Thanks Chri -- chrischivers chrischivers |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
"chrischivers" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed). .. > > Hello > > I was wondering if anyone could help me. I am interested in getting > Bulldog Broadband (inc line rental). Does the 18866 service (or 0808 > 170 7788 alternative number) work with this company? > > > Many Thanks > > Chris Yes it does (the 0800 does), but you would be better off with the 1899 number (www.1899.com) for peak calls as they charge a flat 3p whereas 18866 charge per minute. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 29 Jul 2005 20:29, "Deag" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Yes it does (the 0800 does), but you would be better off with the 1899 >number (www.1899.com) for peak calls as they charge a flat 3p whereas 18866 >charge per minute. For calls to where ? 18866 has a 2p connection fee, 1899 charges 3p, but the cost per call after that can be from 0p/min (for UK geographic landline numbers) on both of them, so for UK calls (only) one might pay 50% more when using 1899 compared with 18866. All depends on where one calls. Peter M. -- UK ADSL <http://tinyurl.com/5jpa4> - Happy to save cash with Plus.Net!! |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
> >>Yes it does (the 0800 does), but you would be better off with the 1899 >>number (www.1899.com) for peak calls as they charge a flat 3p whereas >>18866 >>charge per minute. > > For calls to where ? 18866 has a 2p connection fee, 1899 charges 3p, but > the cost per call after that can be from 0p/min (for UK geographic > landline > numbers) on both of them, so for UK calls (only) one might pay 50% more > when > using 1899 compared with 18866. All depends on where one calls. Peter > M. Sorry I should have added UK calls. 18866 charge 0.5p/per minute on their 0800 number whereas 1899 is 0p. That is the differenve betwenn them. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 30 Jul 2005 07:42:13 +0100, poster <us-(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote: >On 29 Jul 2005 20:29, "Deag" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote: > >>Yes it does (the 0800 does), but you would be better off with the 1899 >>number (www.1899.com) for peak calls as they charge a flat 3p whereas 18866 >>charge per minute. > >For calls to where ? 18866 has a 2p connection fee, 1899 charges 3p, but >the cost per call after that can be from 0p/min (for UK geographic landline >numbers) on both of them, so for UK calls (only) one might pay 50% more when >using 1899 compared with 18866. All depends on where one calls. Peter M. Not so. Read Deag's post again. Deag is referring to per minute charges when accessing 18866 via 0808 number. You are referring to charges when accessing via 18866 or 1899 prefix. See http://www.call18866.co.uk/mobilerates.php for details. -- cerberus |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 30 Jul 2005 09:00 GMT, "Deag" wrote:
>Sorry I should have added UK calls. 18866 charge 0.5p/per minute on their >0800 number whereas 1899 is 0p. That is the differenve betwenn them. Thanks - ah yes, I can understand the earlier comment much better now :-) I was thinking of the indirect access charges, using the 1xxx prefixes. Sorry for any confusion to anyone else! Peter M. -- UK ADSL <http://tinyurl.com/5jpa4> - Happy to save cash with Plus.Net!! |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 30 Jul 2005 09:00 GMT, "Deag" wrote:
>Sorry I should have added UK calls. 18866 charge 0.5p/per minute on their >0800 number whereas 1899 is 0p. That is the differenve betwenn them. Thanks - ah yes, I can understand the earlier comment much better now :-) I was thinking of the indirect access charges, using the 1xxx prefixes. Sorry for any confusion to anyone else! Peter M. -- UK ADSL <http://tinyurl.com/5jpa4> - Happy to save cash with Plus.Net!! |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"poster" <us-(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed). net... > On 30 Jul 2005 09:00 GMT, "Deag" wrote: > >>Sorry I should have added UK calls. 18866 charge 0.5p/per minute on their >>0800 number whereas 1899 is 0p. That is the differenve betwenn them. > > Thanks - ah yes, I can understand the earlier comment much better now :-) > I was thinking of the indirect access charges, using the 1xxx prefixes. > Sorry for any confusion to anyone else! Peter M. > > -- > > UK ADSL <http://tinyurl.com/5jpa4> - Happy to save cash with Plus.Net!! You can not use the 1xxx numbers from Bulldog though, I know as I have Bulldog. |
![]() |
| Tags |
| bulldog |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|