|
||||||||
|
|
#1
|
|
Hi guys
Well I've been with Central Point for 4 months (I think) on a 1m line. All of a sudden, the speeds have dropped from pretty much 1002Kbps every time to just under 300Kbps. Sent a few tickets and have been told that its down to contention. I am currently on a 50:1 contention ratio but has had absolutely no effect on the line over the last few months. Every time I did the speed test on www.adslguide.org and has barely changed over the last four months. Could it really have that much of an effect?? Unhappy and going really slowly Pete PeteIvy |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:40:56 -0000, "PeteIvy"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote: >Could it really have that much of an effect?? yes. This is a Datastream service I believe, so CPBB have a connection (via Telefonica ?) to your exchange over which your service is provided. This might be a 2M connection, perhaps you were an early bird and one of the few on it, now it is filling up and there might be 10 of you 1M users sharing that pipe (and maybe 30 512k users) so it would only need 6 of you to be running a download to pull the speed down to 300k or so. Phil -- Splenda - the only sweetener made from chlorine :-) |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 08/01/2005 Phil Thompson wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:40:56 -0000, "PeteIvy" > <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote: > > > Could it really have that much of an effect?? > > yes. This is a Datastream service I believe, so CPBB have a connection > (via Telefonica ?) to your exchange over which your service is > provided. This might be a 2M connection, perhaps you were an early > bird and one of the few on it, now it is filling up and there might be > 10 of you 1M users sharing that pipe (and maybe 30 512k users) so it > would only need 6 of you to be running a download to pull the speed > down to 300k or so. > > Phil This is probably a naive question but... When the majority of people have BB and are using it most of the time will we all be back down to dial up speeds or doesn't it work like that? -- Jeff Gaines Posted with XanaNews 1.17.1.2 http://www.wilsonc.demon.co.uk/delphi.htm |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 8 Jan 2005 10:08:21 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote: >When the majority of people have BB and are using it most of the time >will we all be back down to dial up speeds or doesn't it work like that? its all down to the management of it. BT's IPstream products for home use have an advertised contention of 50:1 but are thought to be more like 15:1 in practice. They have the advantage of many more customers so the statisitics work better - if you have a 10M pipe the chances of enough customers going full tilt at the same time to fill it are small. If you have a small datastream pipe each customer is a bigger proportion so filling it up is more likely. I think the internal standard is minimum 100k on a IPstream500 service, below that and action is taken to make the pipe bigger, allegedly. Phil -- Splenda - the only sweetener made from chlorine :-) |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 08/01/2005 Phil Thompson wrote:
> On 8 Jan 2005 10:08:21 GMT, "Jeff Gaines" <(E-Mail Removed)> > wrote: > > > When the majority of people have BB and are using it most of the > > time will we all be back down to dial up speeds or doesn't it work > > like that? > > its all down to the management of it. BT's IPstream products for home > use have an advertised contention of 50:1 but are thought to be more > like 15:1 in practice. They have the advantage of many more customers > so the statisitics work better - if you have a 10M pipe the chances of > enough customers going full tilt at the same time to fill it are > small. If you have a small datastream pipe each customer is a bigger > proportion so filling it up is more likely. > > I think the internal standard is minimum 100k on a IPstream500 > service, below that and action is taken to make the pipe bigger, > allegedly. > > Phil Many thanks, that's encouraging. Having waited three years for BB to arrive (it's due next Wednesday) I had visions of the whole village tuning in to streaming TV or something similar and leaving me with a slower connection than I have currently. -- Jeff Gaines Posted with XanaNews 1.17.1.2 http://www.wilsonc.demon.co.uk/delphi.htm |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Phil Thompson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)... > On Fri, 7 Jan 2005 23:40:56 -0000, "PeteIvy" > <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote: > >>Could it really have that much of an effect?? > > yes. This is a Datastream service I believe, so CPBB have a connection > (via Telefonica ?) to your exchange over which your service is > provided. This might be a 2M connection, perhaps you were an early > bird and one of the few on it, now it is filling up and there might be > 10 of you 1M users sharing that pipe (and maybe 30 512k users) so it > would only need 6 of you to be running a download to pull the speed > down to 300k or so. > > Phil > -- Well I live in a village that has not long discovered electricity, let alone broadband. We got switched on about August/Sept time. I've had no speed problems whatsoever since we've been up and running. Did a speed test last night. 1am and got a fantastic speed of 197Kbps and just done one a few minutes ago and its 553Kbps. So I'm not really clued up on this contention thing. I take it it would change if I moved to another ISP? Os is the contention set by the ISP themselves? TIA Pete |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 8 Jan 2005 in uk.telecom.broadband, "PeteIvy" wrote:
>So I'm not really clued up on this contention thing. I take it it would >change if I moved to another ISP? Os is the contention set by the ISP >themselves? As Phil has indicated, while contention is likely to be present to an extent for all connections, there's a difference in implementation and when you have an IPstream service (the majority of ADSL services) then there willbe contention of usually more users in a bigger pipe and low effect on individuals while Datastream services allow the ISP to buy a connection from each exchange and the size of that, and number of your local users will have a more noticeable effect. I use Tiscali's net, but have service from a different ISP (which buys from Tiscali) and I have found no significant problems (my one concern is number of hops made within the UK). <http://makeashorterlink.com/?B20D1203A> shows the results of the checker you used, while the checker on ADSLguide <http://makeashorterlink.com/?K14D2103A> shows about the same. PGM -- PlusNet <http://tinyurl.com/24ymz> - I recommend them and save some cash. My other ISP : UK Free Software Network <http://www.ukfsn.org> UKFSN passes all profits to Free Software projects in the UK. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:50:52 -0000, "PeteIvy"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote: >So I'm not really clued up on this contention thing. I take it it would >change if I moved to another ISP? Os is the contention set by the ISP >themselves? two types of product - IPStream and Datastream. Former is managed by BT from you to the ISP. Latter is managed by ISP from your exchange. In the datastream case then different ISPs may give different contentions on the exchange link. With IPstream all the ISPs will see the same contention for a given exchange up to BT's "cloud". Another level of contention can arise between BT's "cloud" and the ISP, depending how many users they cram onto a "Central" link and how busy those users are. Hence the Plusnet "bad boys pipe" where a select few very heavy users are on one pipe contending with each other. The whole internet is a contended network, bit like the roads. So the speed you see can be limited by your link to the exchange, the exchange to BT, ISP link to BT, ISP out to net, internet traffic and contention for an individual server on the net. Exchange IPStream contention / VP status can be found on www.samknows.com or somewhere on Plusnet's usertools site. Phil -- Splenda - the only sweetener made from chlorine :-) |
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Phil Thompson" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:(E-Mail Removed)... > On Sat, 8 Jan 2005 12:50:52 -0000, "PeteIvy" > <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote: > >>So I'm not really clued up on this contention thing. I take it it would >>change if I moved to another ISP? Os is the contention set by the ISP >>themselves? > > two types of product - IPStream and Datastream. Former is managed by > BT from you to the ISP. Latter is managed by ISP from your exchange. > > In the datastream case then different ISPs may give different > contentions on the exchange link. With IPstream all the ISPs will see > the same contention for a given exchange up to BT's "cloud". > > Another level of contention can arise between BT's "cloud" and the > ISP, depending how many users they cram onto a "Central" link and how > busy those users are. Hence the Plusnet "bad boys pipe" where a select > few very heavy users are on one pipe contending with each other. > > The whole internet is a contended network, bit like the roads. So the > speed you see can be limited by your link to the exchange, the > exchange to BT, ISP link to BT, ISP out to net, internet traffic and > contention for an individual server on the net. > > Exchange IPStream contention / VP status can be found on > www.samknows.com or somewhere on Plusnet's usertools site. > > Phil > -- > Splenda - the only sweetener made from chlorine :-) Whilst on the subject of contention ratios... I'm just in the process of upgrading from a 512K BB link with 50:1 contention ratio and am considering 2 options from my ISP:- 1. 2Meg Pipe with a 50:1 contention ratio @£39.99 per month 2. 1Meg link with 20:1 contention @ £64.99 pm As the link is being used to work remotely (accessing corporate network via VPN), which of these set-ups is going to give me the best balance between speed and reliability? My gut is to go for the 2Meg pipe with the higher contention ratio. As I live in a predominantly residential area, I guess the resources at my exchange are going to be in relatively low demand during business hours when I would be using my connection. TIA for your thoughts Nick |
![]() |
| Tags |
| contention |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|