|
||||||||
|
|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|
Seems to be working now, apart from email (can take up to 24hr for BT
cockups..er..changes..to propagate through their systems), but one thing I have noticed is that ssh sessions timeout if they're left idle for too long and also remote VNC connections sometimes do the same. Didn;t get this on 512K. We had 80%+ packet loss on Monday morning which might have explained it, but things are rock(ish) solid now - anyone else seen this. I can't think of anything tweakable that may affect this (MTU different for 2MB??) but any feedback or comments would be welcome. L3K Linker3000 |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 19 Oct 2004 in uk.telecom.broadband, Linker3000 wrote:
>Subject: Are you as fed up with my 2Mb upgrade as me yet...? >Seems to be working now, apart from email .... Interesting to watch someone having this done, but myself and some of my business clients have ADSL from more than one ISP, so a bit of downtime with one (or no service at all) doesn't lead to massive problems :-) Having everything depend on one seems a bit too risky (I would still have Highway as backup if BT had not required everyone move to BT Together a few months back, as that was independent of ADSL kit in my local exchange but I'd get a 56k modem into use if it all fell apart tomorrow :-) Peter -- PlusNet <http://tinyurl.com/24ymz> - I recommend them and save some cash. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Peter M wrote:
> On 19 Oct 2004 in uk.telecom.broadband, Linker3000 wrote: > > >>Subject: Are you as fed up with my 2Mb upgrade as me yet...? >>Seems to be working now, apart from email .... > > > Interesting to watch someone having this done, but myself and some of my > business clients have ADSL from more than one ISP, so a bit of downtime > with one (or no service at all) doesn't lead to massive problems :-) > > Having everything depend on one seems a bit too risky (I would still have > Highway as backup if BT had not required everyone move to BT Together a > few months back, as that was independent of ADSL kit in my local exchange > but I'd get a 56k modem into use if it all fell apart tomorrow :-) Peter > I agree - we're likely to move some auxillary sites to Zen and also re-jig an existing ISDN link at HQ for this reason. I am just sorting out what I inherited at HQ and now that certain services (Intranet, remote backup and hosting our own mail server) will be come more critical, I will be making sure that WE are able to cope! We're only piloting the Intranet site at the moment and I'd already ordered the 'redundant', off-site servers, but due to a delivery cock up they arrived one week later than planned and so I could only get the secondary Intranet server running 2 days into the outage. In all events this was not a serious business outage but just a pain in the ass that had me wasting time chasing BT to confirm that SOMEONE was sorting it - shame you can't make one phone call and just know that someone will call back (as promised!) when things are put right. The 2Mb upgrade was part of our 'planning for the future' but thankfully the project plan ensured that we'd not gone 'live' with anything major at this time. L3K |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Linker3000 wrote:
> Seems to be working now, apart from email (can take up to 24hr for BT > cockups..er..changes..to propagate through their systems), but one thing > I have noticed is that ssh sessions timeout if they're left idle for too > long and also remote VNC connections sometimes do the same. Didn;t get > this on 512K. > > We had 80%+ packet loss on Monday morning which might have explained it, > but things are rock(ish) solid now - anyone else seen this. > > I can't think of anything tweakable that may affect this (MTU different > for 2MB??) but any feedback or comments would be welcome. > > L3K Looks like Draytek haven't got their multi-NAT/Multi-IP handling quite rock solid - there's a thread about this specific problem on the UK Draytek support forums. I'mm downgrade my opinion of Draytek kit from 10/10 to 9.5/10! Can anyone tell me of their multi-NAT/Multi IP experiences with other kit? TIA |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
In message <41751230$0$27542$(E-Mail Removed)>, Linker3000
<(E-Mail Removed)> writes >Can anyone tell me of their multi-NAT/Multi IP experiences with other kit? Seems fine with ZyXEL kit - in my case a no-NAT Prestige 650H-E1 with its firewall off on the WAN 1 port of a ZyXEL ZyWALL 35. The only thing that doesn't work properly is multicast, which I would have liked to try with the BBC Multicast trials that Zen peer with. That said, the release notes of the P650H-E1 say that IGMP doesn't work - so that's probably the reason. ZyXEL's multi-NAT implementation seems to be well rated on all their multi-NAT capable kit. The ZyWALL 35 should get 3.63 firmware in the next few weeks, making it a proper load balancing dual WAN router and adding certainly other 'missing' functionality, such as WPA if you have a wireless card inserted, also DNS server capabilities. David -- David Wood (E-Mail Removed) |
![]() |
| Tags |
| 2mb, fed, upgrade |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|