Strange Routing Behavior

I have a dedicated server hosted in California. The server runs SMTP,
SSH and HTTP. This morning (~7 AM PDT - UTC-0700) attempts to connect to
it on port 25, either by name or by IP address, were redirected to
smtp2-cm.mail.eni.net. When I tried telneting to my server on port 25 I
got the SMTP banner for smtp2-cm.mail.eni.net.

Curiously, I was still able to connect to my server on port 22 (SSH), so
I logged in, fired up tcpdump and monitored port 25. Then I opened a
second local command-line (on my laptop) and telneted to port 25 on the
server. Again I got the smtp banner from smtp2-cm.mail.eni.net, and saw
no incoming traffic on my server in tcpdump.

As far as I know, this is not possible. If traffic is being misrouted
it would affect all ports, not a subset. Can someone explain the
circumstances that would result in this behavior?

The problem corrected itself within a couple of hours, and is working
OK now, but I'd really like to understand what happened.

On Fri, 01 Sep 2006 19:51:12 -0700, Jim Garrison <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>I have a dedicated server hosted in California. The server runs SMTP,
>SSH and HTTP. This morning (~7 AM PDT - UTC-0700) attempts to connect to
>it on port 25, either by name or by IP address, were redirected to
>smtp2-cm.mail.eni.net. When I tried telneting to my server on port 25 I
>got the SMTP banner for smtp2-cm.mail.eni.net.
>
>Curiously, I was still able to connect to my server on port 22 (SSH), so
>I logged in, fired up tcpdump and monitored port 25. Then I opened a
>second local command-line (on my laptop) and telneted to port 25 on the
>server. Again I got the smtp banner from smtp2-cm.mail.eni.net, and saw
>no incoming traffic on my server in tcpdump.
>
>As far as I know, this is not possible. If traffic is being misrouted
>it would affect all ports, not a subset. Can someone explain the
>circumstances that would result in this behavior?
>
>The problem corrected itself within a couple of hours, and is working
>OK now, but I'd really like to understand what happened.


That is odd. The only thing I can think of is if you connected to
port 25 by your server name, but connected to port 22 via the IP
address. That would point to a dns issue.

Grog

Grog wrote:
> That is odd. The only thing I can think of is if you connected to
> port 25 by your server name, but connected to port 22 via the IP
> address. That would point to a dns issue.

That was the first thing that came to mind, so I tried both
IP and hostname, with identical results.

The other obvious answer is some sort of proxy between me and
the server, but AFAIK there wasn't one.