"Peter Pan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed) m...
> "ps56k" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:hjdhu7$jkv$(E-Mail Removed)...
>>
>> "Bob" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>>> On 21/01/2010 23:56, Tony Hwang wrote:
>>>> bitz wrote:
>>>>> Should encription like wep / wpa etc be any different if your laptop
>>>>> is connected in Wireless N mode v's G or B etc.
>>>>> Here's whats bugging me at the moment. I have a new toshiba laptop
>>>>> with wireless N capabilities and a dlink DIR-615 router. The DIR-615
>>>>> has a setting which can force "wireless N only" mode which i turned on
>>>>> just to test out the wireless N speeds etc. With encription turned off
>>>>> it connects ok (speed was 150mbs ..5m across the room). The minute i
>>>>> turn wep or wpa or wpa2 on my laptop wont connect (yeh im putting in
>>>>> the same passcode into the laptop etc!). Yet if if change the router
>>>>> to accept all speeds (ie wireless N G B etc), it connects ok wiht
>>>>> WEP/WPA etc but only connects at 54mbit G settings ..not N. Basically
>>>>> if i use any encription ie wpa/wep etc it wont connect with wireless
>>>>> N settings?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Any ideas?
>>>> Hi,
>>>> I had similar issue with Belkin N+router. It is a design fault of WiFi
>>>> radio chip in the router. Maybe your D-link router uses same chip.
>>>>
>>> It was a function of the 802.11n draft.
>>>
>>> "The IEEE* 802.11n Draft prohibits using High Throughput with WEP or
>>> TKIP as the unicast cipher. If you use these encryption methods (e.g.
>>> WEP, WPA-TKIP), your data rate will drop to 54 Mbps. Newer Intel?
>>> wireless adapter client drivers connect using a legacy IEEE 802.11g
>>> connection rather than failing to connect altogether, which complies
>>> with the IEEE 802.11n draft."
>>> <http://www.intel.com/support/wireless/wlan/4965agn/sb/CS-025643.htm>
>>
>> wow - thanks for posting -
>> will have to remember that for future....
>> does the actual "N" spec now allow for these encryptions ?
>>
>>
>
> What actual N spec? it's still in draft, final specs aren't/defined
> approved yet....
hey Tinker Bell -
do you ever have anything useful to add to a discussion ?
or just the slings & arrows...
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IEEE_802.11n-2009#Timeline