Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Linux Networking > strange Ethernet problem

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

strange Ethernet problem

 
 
Erhardt Georg Kurzhals
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-06-2009, 12:32 AM
Hi all,

I installed Ubuntu 6.06 LTS from the CD on an old PowerPC Macintosh, and
got everything, including internet access, working okay. Then I updated
to 8.04 LTS. Now I can't get to the network! For url Firefox says
"address not found". For IP address it says "failed to connect ...
though seems to be valid".

Network Settings shows wired connection with "address: dhcp" but IP
address, DNS, etc. are blank. Network tools lists eth0 in menu and
shows an ipv6 address, but the hardware address, etc. are "not
available". The "received packets" count keeps going up!

If I boot to the 6.06 CD, Network settings does not even show wired
connection!

I use the built-in 100base-t connected to a router using DHCP.

Any clues how to fix or at least dignose?

TIA

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
david
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-06-2009, 02:54 AM
On Sat, 05 Sep 2009 20:32:53 -0400, Erhardt Georg Kurzhals rearranged some
electrons to say:

> Hi all,
>
> I installed Ubuntu 6.06 LTS from the CD on an old PowerPC Macintosh, and
> got everything, including internet access, working okay. Then I updated
> to 8.04 LTS. Now I can't get to the network! For url Firefox says
> "address not found". For IP address it says "failed to connect ...
> though seems to be valid".
>
> Network Settings shows wired connection with "address: dhcp" but IP
> address, DNS, etc. are blank. Network tools lists eth0 in menu and
> shows an ipv6 address, but the hardware address, etc. are "not
> available". The "received packets" count keeps going up!
>
> If I boot to the 6.06 CD, Network settings does not even show wired
> connection!
>
> I use the built-in 100base-t connected to a router using DHCP.
>
> Any clues how to fix or at least dignose?
>
> TIA


Does your ISP support ipv6?
 
Reply With Quote
 
Erhardt Georg Kurzhals
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-07-2009, 05:24 PM
Moe Trin wrote:
> On Sat, 05 Sep 2009, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.networking, in
> article <3225f$4aa30336$adbc7e0a$(E-Mail Removed)>, Erhardt Georg Kurzhals
> wrote:
>
>> ... SNIP ...

> Look at the output of the following commands
>
> cat /etc/resolv.conf

the file is empty
>
>
> /sbin/ifconfig -a

shows only inet6 fe80::...
>
> /sbin/route -n

shows nothing
>

.... SNIP ...
> Either a misconfigured DHCP client (I don't use DHCP), or server?

with the comments removed, dhclient.conf is:
send host-name "<hostname>";
request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, time-offset, routers,
domain-name, domain-name-servers, host-name,
netbios-name-servers, netbios-scope;
timeout 30;

....SNIP ...
> Old guy

After this, I did some experiments. If I change from dhcp to
static IP, supplying a network compatible IPv4 address, subnet mask, and
the IP of my router, then I can visit websites I visited before, but not
any new sites. I then switch back to dhcp, and things work okay.
However, after I restart the computer it is back to the old problem.
Other possible clues:
1. I get "failed" for loading hardware drivers during boot, (and
something else that scrolls away before I can read it.)
2. Devices - Network Tools for eth0 shows in IP Information, both IPv4
(sensible) and IPv6 (fe80...), and in Interface Information, a sensible
Hardware address, but Link speed is "not available".
 
Reply With Quote
 
Unruh
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-07-2009, 05:31 PM
Erhardt Georg Kurzhals <(E-Mail Removed)> writes:

>Moe Trin wrote:
>> On Sat, 05 Sep 2009, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.networking, in
>> article <3225f$4aa30336$adbc7e0a$(E-Mail Removed)>, Erhardt Georg Kurzhals
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ... SNIP ...

>> Look at the output of the following commands
>>
>> cat /etc/resolv.conf

>the file is empty


Well, that means that no address can be resolved unless it is in your
/etc/hosts file. Why is it empty?


>>
>>
> > /sbin/ifconfig -a

>shows only inet6 fe80::...


It sounds like you do not really have a connection.


>>
>> /sbin/route -n

>shows nothing


And why in the world do you not actually post all of the output here.
What is nothing to you may be critical info to us. For example there
should be local (lo) routes.


>>

>... SNIP ...
>> Either a misconfigured DHCP client (I don't use DHCP), or server?

>with the comments removed, dhclient.conf is:
>send host-name "<hostname>";


>request subnet-mask, broadcast-address, time-offset, routers,
> domain-name, domain-name-servers, host-name,
> netbios-name-servers, netbios-scope;
>timeout 30;


>...SNIP ...
>> Old guy

> After this, I did some experiments. If I change from dhcp to
>static IP, supplying a network compatible IPv4 address, subnet mask, and
>the IP of my router, then I can visit websites I visited before, but not
>any new sites. I then switch back to dhcp, and things work okay.
>However, after I restart the computer it is back to the old problem.
> Other possible clues:
>1. I get "failed" for loading hardware drivers during boot, (and
>something else that scrolls away before I can read it.)


dmesg|less

>2. Devices - Network Tools for eth0 shows in IP Information, both IPv4
>(sensible) and IPv6 (fe80...), and in Interface Information, a sensible
>Hardware address, but Link speed is "not available".

 
Reply With Quote
 
Pascal Hambourg
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      09-08-2009, 09:19 PM
Hello,

Moe Trin a écrit :
> Erhardt Georg Kurzhals wrote:
>
>>> cat /etc/resolv.conf

>> the file is empty

>
> Thus, your O/S has no idea _who_ to ask to resolve addresses.


Yes it does. When the file is empty, it assumes the nameserver is localhost.

>>> /sbin/ifconfig -a

>> shows only inet6 fe80::...

>
> Interface not being configured - the 'fe80::' address is basically an
> "I don't have a real address, so I'll use this".


Not really. This is just the autoconfigured IPv6 link-local address
which is mandatory on any IPv6-enabled interface.

> These addresses,
> like 169.254.x.x are set when the system can't contact a DHCP server.


Not really. They are both link-local addresses, but if 169.254.x.x are
mostly associated to DHCP failure, fe80:: are not.

> Like the RFC1918 addresses, these must never appear on the Internet,
> and thus are "local use only".


Worse : link-local addresses are not routable, whereas private addresses
are routable (on a private network only of course).
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strange PCI Ethernet NIC... Bubba Windows Networking 9 07-06-2005 10:47 PM
Strange PCI Ethernet NIC... Bubba Windows Networking 2 07-04-2005 04:09 PM
Strange PCI Ethernet NIC... Bubba Windows Networking 0 07-04-2005 02:23 PM
problem setting up moto we800g ethernet bridge with linksys ethernet router I'm NOT DON Windows Networking 0 05-30-2005 07:50 PM
Strange Ethernet Card Behaviour Daniel Tallentire Linux Networking 0 07-19-2003 07:04 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11