On Wed, 01 Feb 2006, in the Usenet newsgroup comp.os.linux.networking, in
article <(E-Mail Removed) x>,
Jacob Kristensen wrote:
>Could somebody help me explain this:
>$ dig @194.239.10.41 www.8ingatlan.hu
>www.8ingatlan.hu. 41085 IN A 192.168.0.1
Apparently, the person who owns that domain is tired of worms banging
on the site, and set the name server to return that answer. Do a whois
lookup of the domain at RIPE, and it refers you to
domain_pri_ns: ns4.rooter.hu[195.228.155.39]
and that name server is providing the RFC1918 answer with a TTL of 12 hours.
;; got answer:
;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 6
;; flags: qr aa rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 1, AUTHORITY: 2, ADDITIONAL: 2
;; QUERY SECTION:
;;
www.8ingatlan.hu, type = A, class = IN
;; ANSWER SECTION:
www.8ingatlan.hu. 12H IN A 192.168.0.1
;; AUTHORITY SECTION:
8ingatlan.hu. 12H IN NS ns4.rooter.hu.
8ingatlan.hu. 12H IN NS ns1.rooter.hu.
;; ADDITIONAL SECTION:
ns1.rooter.hu. 1H IN A 195.228.254.116
ns4.rooter.hu. 1H IN A 195.228.155.39
>A friend of mine with a different ISP gets the same result using the
>DNS server of his ISP.
because the authoratative server for the domain is providing that as
the answer.
Old guy