static or dynamic which is better?

--
No e-mail address here please reply via newsgroup

On Thu, 4 Dec 2003 21:07:23 +0000 (UTC), "Whiteflyer"
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

Depends what you need. If you needed static then static would be
better than dynamic.

What do you need?

--
Hiram Hackenbacker

x-no-archive: yes
Whiteflyer news:bqo7ma$fvg$(E-Mail Removed)

Static is useful if running a server.
Dynamic provides better privacy.

Back Jauer wrote:

> Dynamic provides better privacy.
>

Unlikely. No IP at all provides better privacy.

Bat Guano wrote:

> Back Jauer wrote:
>
>> Dynamic provides better privacy.
>>
>
> Unlikely. No IP at all provides better privacy.
>
>

But it's a bit hard to connect without one...

go static as static will do everything that dynamic will do plus more. As u
get more into this broadband thing, you might find that u need static then u
might have to shell out. There are isp's who only do static and so no shell
out later.

Well, that is my opinion
"Whiteflyer" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:bqo7ma$fvg$(E-Mail Removed)...
>
>
> --
> No e-mail address here please reply via newsgroup
>
>