On 20 Feb 2004 06:13:39 -0800,
(E-Mail Removed) (Arthur) wrote:
>"skeeter" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:<(E-Mail Removed)>...
>
>> > In general, spacing them apart by 2-3 times their diameter, or length
>> > should be adequate.
>> > Why do you think they are interfering?
>
>Well, it's an assumption of mine actually. I'm having difficulty with
>connections when I have too many antennas close together. I also have
>trouble with Planet WAP-4000 802.11g APs crashing for unexpected
>reasons (or no evident reason, for that matter) at unexpected moments
>(whenever, actually).
>
>What should the effect of too many antennas too close together
>theoretically be? Am I coming to a correct conclusion?
>
>arthur
Visualize a bubble around the antenna which is actually the RF waves.
If one bubble overlaps another it will influence the reception or
radiation of that antenna. That's why the spacing suggestion.
One effect is that the overlap will cause the antenna to become
"untuned". Transmitters and antenna have to be matched in order to
get the optimum radiation of signal. When detuned the transmitter
does work as well and at the low power being used it doesn't take much
to screw things up. HAM radio transmitters, on the modern equipment,
will shut down if the SWR (Standing Wave Ratio) is off to far as it
can damage them.
If you've got an amateur radio club around ask them for help as they
will be well versed in antenna and their properties.
Kirk
"Moe, Larry, the cheese!", Curly
www.sandpoint.net/captkirk
www.stormyacres.com