SRV records

I apologize that this message is somewhat off-topic. We have a proprietary
system that is running BIND 9.1.3 and I need to populate this server with
the appropriate records for our domain controllers.

If someone could point me to a HOWTO I would greatly appreciate it.

Blake

http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...22461?v=glance

"Blake" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> I apologize that this message is somewhat off-topic. We have a
proprietary
> system that is running BIND 9.1.3 and I need to populate this server with
> the appropriate records for our domain controllers.
>
> If someone could point me to a HOWTO I would greatly appreciate it.
>
> Blake
>
>

> I apologize that this message is somewhat off-topic. We have a
> proprietary system that is running BIND 9.1.3 and I need to populate this
> server with the appropriate records for our domain controllers.

> If someone could point me to a HOWTO I would greatly appreciate it.

Did you see this webcast ?

http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;324858

Regards

--

* ObiWan

Microsoft MVP: Windows Server - Networking
http://www.microsoft.com/communities/MVP/MVP.mspx
http://italy.mvps.org

DNS "fail-safe" for Windows clients.
http://www.ntcanuck.com

Newsgroups and forums
news://news.ntcanuck.com
http://forums.ntcanuck.com

408+ XP/2000 tweaks and tips
http://www.ntcanuck.com/tq/Tip_Quarry.htm

thanks

"Neteng" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg...22461?v=glance
>
> "Blake" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> I apologize that this message is somewhat off-topic. We have a
> proprietary
>> system that is running BIND 9.1.3 and I need to populate this server with
>> the appropriate records for our domain controllers.
>>
>> If someone could point me to a HOWTO I would greatly appreciate it.
>>
>> Blake
>>
>>
>
>

thanks

"ObiWan" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>> I apologize that this message is somewhat off-topic. We have a
>> proprietary system that is running BIND 9.1.3 and I need to populate this
>> server with the appropriate records for our domain controllers.
>
>> If someone could point me to a HOWTO I would greatly appreciate it.
>
> Did you see this webcast ?
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;324858
>
> Regards
>
> --
>
> * ObiWan
>
> Microsoft MVP: Windows Server - Networking
> http://www.microsoft.com/communities/MVP/MVP.mspx
> http://italy.mvps.org
>
> DNS "fail-safe" for Windows clients.
> http://www.ntcanuck.com
>
> Newsgroups and forums
> news://news.ntcanuck.com
> http://forums.ntcanuck.com
>
> 408+ XP/2000 tweaks and tips
> http://www.ntcanuck.com/tq/Tip_Quarry.htm
>
>

In news:(E-Mail Removed),
Blake <(E-Mail Removed)> stated, which I then commented on
below:
> I apologize that this message is somewhat off-topic. We have a
> proprietary system that is running BIND 9.1.3 and I need to populate
> this server with the appropriate records for our domain controllers.
>
> If someone could point me to a HOWTO I would greatly appreciate it.
>
> Blake

The webcast link posted by Obiwan is a good one. Here's a some links that
may help as well:

Windows 2003 Interoperability with unix DNS Servers:
http://www.avidware.net/Linux/Window...dns-server.asp

Configuring Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) to Support AD:
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/its...c/cfgbind.mspx

BIND Your Windows 2000 DNS - from MCP Mag:
http://www.mcpmag.com/features/artic...itorialsID=273


--
Regards,
Ace

Please direct all replies ONLY to the Microsoft public newsgroups
so all can benefit.

This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees
and confers no rights.

Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSE+I, MCT, MVP
Microsoft Windows MVP - Windows Server - Directory Services
Infinite Diversities in Infinite Combinations.
=================================

these look very good

thanks again guys

Blake
"Ace Fekay [MVP]"
<PleaseSubstituteMyActualFirstName&LastNameHere@ho tmail.com> wrote in
message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> In news:(E-Mail Removed),
> Blake <(E-Mail Removed)> stated, which I then commented on
> below:
>> I apologize that this message is somewhat off-topic. We have a
>> proprietary system that is running BIND 9.1.3 and I need to populate
>> this server with the appropriate records for our domain controllers.
>>
>> If someone could point me to a HOWTO I would greatly appreciate it.
>>
>> Blake
>
> The webcast link posted by Obiwan is a good one. Here's a some links that
> may help as well:
>
> Windows 2003 Interoperability with unix DNS Servers:
> http://www.avidware.net/Linux/Window...dns-server.asp
>
> Configuring Berkeley Internet Name Domain (BIND) to Support AD:
> http://www.microsoft.com/technet/its...c/cfgbind.mspx
>
> BIND Your Windows 2000 DNS - from MCP Mag:
> http://www.mcpmag.com/features/artic...itorialsID=273
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Ace
>
> Please direct all replies ONLY to the Microsoft public newsgroups
> so all can benefit.
>
> This posting is provided "AS-IS" with no warranties or guarantees
> and confers no rights.
>
> Ace Fekay, MCSE 2003 & 2000, MCSA 2003 & 2000, MCSE+I, MCT, MVP
> Microsoft Windows MVP - Windows Server - Directory Services
> Infinite Diversities in Infinite Combinations.
> =================================
>

I appreciate all the links, guys.

All I need is for the BIND machine to able to point clients to the
appropriate DCs. It is a single application, so I don't need a lot of
functionality. Based on the webcast, I think my best bet is zone delegation
for _udp, _tcp, _msdcs, etc. That way I can keep the data on the Windows
DNS boxes.


"Blake" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>I apologize that this message is somewhat off-topic. We have a proprietary
>system that is running BIND 9.1.3 and I need to populate this server with
>the appropriate records for our domain controllers.
>
> If someone could point me to a HOWTO I would greatly appreciate it.
>
> Blake
>

In news:(E-Mail Removed),
Blake <(E-Mail Removed)> stated, which I then commented on
below:
> I appreciate all the links, guys.
>
> All I need is for the BIND machine to able to point clients to the
> appropriate DCs. It is a single application, so I don't need a lot of
> functionality. Based on the webcast, I think my best bet is zone
> delegation for _udp, _tcp, _msdcs, etc. That way I can keep the data
> on the Windows DNS boxes.

Blake,

You mean delegation for the AD namespace? E.g. domain.com is your Internet
domain name, and you use ad.domain.com for your AD DNS domain name? If that
is what you mean, yes, that's a good choice. Makes it easier
administrative-wise. You can also choose a private name, such as domain.net,
which of course is not one you would be using on the Internet.

Ace

We have been running MS DNS in our production environment for years with no
problems.

Our network people have put a small number of clients on a subnet that can
only get to a single server. That server runs BIND and resolves everything
to itself. The problem is the clients need to be able to log onto the
domain. I would like to simply delegate the subdomains:

_udp.ourdomain.edu
_tcp.ourdomain.edu
_sites.ourdomain.edu
_msdcs.ourdomain.edu

Once these clients jump through a hoop, they go on our production network
and our regular AD integrated DNS on Windows 2000. All I need is a single
domain logon per client, then they get on the regular network. So I need
the absolute minimum on the BIND box so that the clients can log onto the
domain the first time.

Thanks
Blake


"Ace Fekay [MVP]"
<PleaseSubstituteMyActualFirstName&LastNameHere@ho tmail.com> wrote in
message news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> In news:(E-Mail Removed),
> Blake <(E-Mail Removed)> stated, which I then commented on
> below:
>> I appreciate all the links, guys.
>>
>> All I need is for the BIND machine to able to point clients to the
>> appropriate DCs. It is a single application, so I don't need a lot of
>> functionality. Based on the webcast, I think my best bet is zone
>> delegation for _udp, _tcp, _msdcs, etc. That way I can keep the data
>> on the Windows DNS boxes.
>
> Blake,
>
> You mean delegation for the AD namespace? E.g. domain.com is your Internet
> domain name, and you use ad.domain.com for your AD DNS domain name? If
> that is what you mean, yes, that's a good choice. Makes it easier
> administrative-wise. You can also choose a private name, such as
> domain.net, which of course is not one you would be using on the Internet.
>
> Ace
>
>
>