Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Broadband > Splittting 'pipe-capacity'?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Splittting 'pipe-capacity'?

 
 
robert w hall
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-12-2004, 09:58 PM
I've seen a couple of references recently to exchanges waiting on the
installation of either an 'ESE switch' or an 'ASDH2 unit' at an existing
enabled-exchange. As I understand it both these units perform a similar
function, and enable BT to
'aggregate network traffic from a number of exchanges within an area
and pipe it back to the core network.'

Questions
1) Is this a correct description of the role of both devices.

2) These devices appear to be relatively new - what did BT do
previously?

3) My impression is that up until recently, any exchange which 'made the
cut' (apart from a few small ones which were 'subtended'), got a full
170Mbps pipe to the core network. Now it appears, many of the existing
links will be shared using these devices. Is this a sign that BT
believes that the actual capacity of the full pipe is not needed at many
of these exchanges, (some of them medium-sized market-towns of 10,000
subscribers apparently).

--
robert w hall
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Sunil Sood
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-13-2004, 05:03 AM
"robert w hall" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)
> I've seen a couple of references recently to exchanges waiting on the
> installation of either an 'ESE switch' or an 'ASDH2 unit' at an
> existing enabled-exchange. As I understand it both these units
> perform a similar function, and enable BT to
> 'aggregate network traffic from a number of exchanges within an area
> and pipe it back to the core network.'
>
> Questions
> 1) Is this a correct description of the role of both devices.


You can read about the "ESE" that BT are likely to be deploying at
http://www.alcatel.de/doctypes/opgda...ESE_R22_ds.pdf

They are also deploying
http://www.alcatel.de/doctypes/opgda...esPlatform.pdf
within their network

Its all part of what is called moving the network intelligence to the "edge"
of the network

> 2) These devices appear to be relatively new - what did BT do
> previously?


BT used to deploy similar devices but many more of them - these new ones
consolidate many tasks into one unit

> 3) My impression is that up until recently, any exchange which 'made
> the cut' (apart from a few small ones which were 'subtended'), got a
> full 170Mbps pipe to the core network.


155Mbps?

> Now it appears, many of the
> existing links will be shared using these devices. Is this a sign
> that BT believes that the actual capacity of the full pipe is not
> needed at many of these exchanges, (some of them medium-sized
> market-towns of 10,000 subscribers apparently).


No, its a sign that BT have been planning/following their "21C Network"
plan - officially launched publically last week - for quite a while

These new boxes allow BT:

- to use the new equipment for multiple tasks, rather than as in the past
when they would have a different "box" per task
- to have the same/more functionallity then previously
- make future upgradability easier (upgrading the network to VoIP etc)

Regards
Sunil


 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tiscali 1MB pipe dream? Tony Broadband 5 07-05-2005 03:40 AM
After a week on PN's pipe of doom 33.12 GB One2Go Broadband 0 12-08-2004 10:06 PM
Is there anyone who's not getting moved over to the pipe of doom? Cheddar Broadband 30 11-28-2004 09:37 PM
plus net pipe size? Mike R Broadband 7 10-11-2004 09:20 PM
Central pipe? Julian M Broadband 8 09-11-2003 10:33 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11