Paul Cupis wrote:
> Mike Scott wrote:
>> (*) Actually I block at firewall level in /8 network chunks.
>
> <sarcasm> That sounds like a good plan. And with only 256 blocks you can
> completely block all spam! </sarcasm>
Oooops. I /keep/ getting that the wrong way round! Should have said
/24 :-(
(Which does seem to work well - the code is correct, I just seem to have
a blind spot there :-( :-( Which also affects the other notes I've
put in this thread. Hangs head and shuffles off quietly ........ )
--
Mike Scott (unet <at> scottsonline.org.uk)
Harlow Essex England
|