> 1. The company doesn't use DHCP at this time. They have about 300 PCs
> and use static private IPs. This helps identify users to their
> accounting package. After reading several books, I can't tell whether
> AD requires DHCP. Is it necessary?
Not required but it is easier and now would be the time to make the change.
Obviously the servers should have a static IP address.
> 2. They have one main office(275 users) and one small office(20 users)
> connected via WAN/T1. My thought is there should be 1 Domain with 2
> OUs(one for each location). I would therefore think you should have
> 20 DCs in each city for redundancy. Is this the right way to think
I would suggest one domain and put the branch office in it's own site. 20
DCs in each city might be over kill :-), at least 2 in the main office and
you should be able to get away with one DC in the branch.
> 3. The first DC will also host a data directory share. It is hoped
> this will get the admin department's feet wet. This shouldn't be a
> load issue should it?
I would suggest creating a member server at the main office to host the
share and hosting the shared folders for the branch office on the branch
office DC.
hth
DDS
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:ed0455d4-9a4b-4ff5-99e0-(E-Mail Removed)...
> Sorry for the newbie questions. I am helping convert a Netware 6.5
> network to windows 2003. I have set up two MS2003 DNS servers and
> they are functioning. I am getting ready to create a first AD DC.
> 1. The company doesn't use DHCP at this time. They have about 300 PCs
> and use static private IPs. This helps identify users to their
> accounting package. After reading several books, I can't tell whether
> AD requires DHCP. Is it necessary?
> 2. They have one main office(275 users) and one small office(20 users)
> connected via WAN/T1. My thought is there should be 1 Domain with 2
> OUs(one for each location). I would therefore think you should have
> 20 DCs in each city for redundancy. Is this the right way to think
> about it?
> 3. The first DC will also host a data directory share. It is hoped
> this will get the admin department's feet wet. This shouldn't be a
> load issue should it?
>
> Sorry again for the newbie questions, but I've also only worked Novell/
> UNIX. I'm sure these will be the first of many from me and my friend
> at the company.
|