thanks Tom
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003 10:56:11 -0700, "Tom" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Jon,
>
>Maybe. You can certainly set up wireless NICs in "ad hoc" mode, so that
>they talk directly with each other without need for an access point. The
>problem would be in how Sygate (or something else) handles NAT. I
>assume you have it set up currently so that one of your PCs acts as the
>internet gateway and provides NAT to the others through an HPNA NIC.
>You could put a wireless NIC in that PC, but I don't know whether Sygate
>would be able to serve NAT over two connections and treat them as if they
>were all on one subnet. Microsoft ICS won't do this.
>
>A simpler solution would be to buy a regular access point plus an HPNA to
>ethernet bridge. Together these would let you hang the access point
>wherever you like on your existing HPNA network -- i.e. anywhere you can
>find a phone line. For around $100 you'd get better radio coverage,
>better
>performance and a lot less headaches. I'm using a Netgear PE102 bridge
>for something very similar. It works fine, but other manufacturers make
>them
>as well -- just shop around a bit.
>
>Good luck,
>Tom
>
>"Jon Hume" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
>news:(E-Mail Removed).. .
>>
>> I am new to wireless lans... My home setup consists of Sygate Network
>> software and HomePhonline nics (no hub or hardware router). This gives
>> my network conectivity and Internet sharing... without having to have
>> a hardware router/switch/hub
>>
>> My question is:
>>
>>
>> Can I use Sygate Network software (or some other Nat software for that
>> matter) with wireless nics WITHOUT having to use a hardware wireless
>> router/hub/access point?
>>
>> The netork in question is a very small office, with 3 or 4 pc's (XP)..
>> with the requirements being:
>>
>> . internal network connectivity (file/printer sharing)
>> . Internet sharing (probably through dialup initially)
>>
>> TIA
>
|