SNR 18, DB 60

Are the above figures not good enough for 1mb service?

upstream figures are 20snr and 63db

Beck wrote:
> Are the above figures not good enough for 1mb service?
>
> upstream figures are 20snr and 63db

If they're accurate you are 3dB outside the limits set by BT for the 1M
service (remembering it's a logarithmic scale so for every 3dB it's
aproximately a halfing or a doubling, in your case it's the formerI'm
afraid )....

"Kraftee" <(E-Mail Removed) please we're bristish.com> wrote
in message news:43285b2b$0$1283$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Beck wrote:
>> Are the above figures not good enough for 1mb service?
>>
>> upstream figures are 20snr and 63db
>
> If they're accurate you are 3dB outside the limits set by BT for the 1M
> service (remembering it's a logarithmic scale so for every 3dB it's
> aproximately a halfing or a doubling, in your case it's the formerI'm
> afraid )....

Thanks, I thought as much. I was hoping with a db of 60 that I might be
able to squeeze in but halfway through writing the original post I noitced
the upstream of 63, so thats probably where I am failing.

your ok for 1mb on those readings
"Beck" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> "Kraftee" <(E-Mail Removed) please we're bristish.com>
> wrote in message
> news:43285b2b$0$1283$(E-Mail Removed)...
>> Beck wrote:
>>> Are the above figures not good enough for 1mb service?
>>>
>>> upstream figures are 20snr and 63db
>>
>> If they're accurate you are 3dB outside the limits set by BT for the 1M
>> service (remembering it's a logarithmic scale so for every 3dB it's
>> aproximately a halfing or a doubling, in your case it's the formerI'm
>> afraid )....
>
> Thanks, I thought as much. I was hoping with a db of 60 that I might be
> able to squeeze in but halfway through writing the original post I noitced
> the upstream of 63, so thats probably where I am failing.
>