Thanks for your help Scott, I have found out that samba 2.2 was included in
redhat 9. This version of samba does not support smb signing. I have read
that samba 3.0 does
smb signing, I think that I have to upgrade my samba.
Have a good day!
"Scott Lowe" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On 2004-10-15 07:45:58 -0400, "Pravind Kumar Jeeanah"
> <(E-Mail Removed)> said:
>
> > I cannot get smbclient (redhat 9) to connect to windows 2003. However on
> > some machines I am able to connect to the server using smb:// on the
> > nautilus browser.
> >
> > Any help is welcome
>
> You might check to see if "Microsoft network server: Digitally sign
> communications (always)" is enabled; this can cause problems with some
> SMB implementations that don't (yet) support SMB signing. (You can
> check this in the Local Security Policy console under Security Settings
> > Local Policies > Security Options.)
>
> Also, for whatever reason, I have also seen instances where a local
> host firewall (ipfw on Mac OS X, in my instance, but this could also be
> applicable to iptables) interferes with SMB to Win2K3, even though all
> the necessary ports are open.
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> --
> Scott Lowe
>
|
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
