There is a nasty file copy/delete bug right now in Win 23k Server + Windows
XP. Basically if you're browsing a folder on a server and do a delete or
copy to that folder, networking will be pathetically slow.
Also, if you use short cuts in your my network places on Windows XP + SP1 +
Patches that point to a Win 2k3 server you'll notice that after about the
second directory down that it takes over 5 minutes to display.
None of this happens with Win 2k clients.
None of this happens with Win XP clients on a Win 2k server.
Insidently, I believe this is related to the horrible slowness of opening
the All Programs item in the start menu on a fully patched Win XP SP1
machine.... (doesn't have anything to do with the copy/delete bug, but the
other one yes, because it happened with the same set of patches that busted
the shortcuts and start menu)
James Hancock
"Lordaeron" <no-spam-(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:534201c3e583$9389e470$(E-Mail Removed)...
>I have been testing Gigabit Ethernet performance on
> Windows Server 2003 and Windows XP SP1 and I was really
> disappointed about the performance on Win2003.
> The adapters used are Intel Pro/1000 MT and CT (onboard).
>
> Using NetIO as benchmark program next to file transfers
> the results were very low. NetIO never gave me more than
> around 24.000k while performing the same test using 2
> WinXP PC's gave me around 100.000k.
> Task Manager shows me the same reports. W2K3 to WXP or
> vice versa transfers never came above 25% but that was
> already exceptional since most of the time it was between
> 8 and 18% in Task Manager.
> WXP to WXP gave me better results but never higher than
> 50%.
>
> This really suprised me. I know that W2K had issues with
> slow networking performance but with 100Mbit networkcards
> I was really impressed by W2K3 since it showed met 98%
> performance in Task Manager with NetIO and I even reached
> that with file transfers.
>
> Is the slow Gigabit performance a bug in W2K3 (and
> perhaps even in WXP)?
> Anyone got a solution to this?
>
|