| Home | Register | Members | Search | Links |
 |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
| |
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
glad to hear that from you
 -- Cordialement, Mathieu CHATEAU http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com "Luit" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message news:49DF54D9-5B5B-438E-AD3D-(E-Mail Removed)... > Well that was indeed the problem, 300 Mb files go from w2k3 server to > another > in seconds. Thanks ! > > Regards > Luit > > "Mathieu CHATEAU" wrote: > >> hello, >> >> whenever you force speed on one side, you MUST do the same on the other >> side. >> Else one will be in full-duplex, the other in half duplex. This result in >> huge packet loss and retransmission. >> >> On gigabit, you should NOT force the speed. >> >> -- >> Cordialement, >> Mathieu CHATEAU >> http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com >> >> >> "Luit" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> news:E1B8234E-5C77-4589-BC96-(E-Mail Removed)... >> > Mathieu, >> > That's an idea. I had some problems in the past with the NICS in the >> > servers >> > being on AUTO, changed this to 100 FD and the problems were over. Will >> > try >> > to >> > perform the same on the switch ports. Thanks, will let you know the >> > outcome. >> > >> > Regards >> > Luit >> > "Mathieu CHATEAU" wrote: >> > >> >> So the bad guy would be server B. >> >> Can you check it's errors (netstat -e) ? >> >> May you switch its network cable with server C and test again between >> >> A >> >> & >> >> B? >> >> >> >> Do you configure your switch to force duplex/speed? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Cordialement, >> >> Mathieu CHATEAU >> >> http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com >> >> >> >> >> >> "Luit" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> >> news:1FC5534E-8B38-4FAB-BCEB-(E-Mail Removed)... >> >> > Sure >> >> > A = Fileserver w2k3 >> >> > B = Terminal server w2k3 >> >> > C = Terminal server w2k >> >> > >> >> > 1. copy file 256 Mb from A to B takes 168 min (according to MS) >> >> > 2. copy file 256 Mb from A to C takes about 8 min (according to MS) >> >> > >> >> > Luit >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > "Mathieu CHATEAU" wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> can you explain again the difference you notice between servers, >> >> >> but >> >> >> naming >> >> >> them server A,B,C so i can sort out your test in my mind ? >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Cordialement, >> >> >> Mathieu CHATEAU >> >> >> http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Luit" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> >> >> news:3BBF2D98-7576-49D1-9A4A-(E-Mail Removed)... >> >> >> > Received Sent >> >> >> > >> >> >> > Bytes 19714103 41253446 >> >> >> > Unicast packets 63552 65396 >> >> >> > Non-unicast packets 1422 223 >> >> >> > Discards 0 0 >> >> >> > Errors 0 0 >> >> >> > Unknown protocols 33 >> >> >> > >> >> >> > is the output of netstat -e on de w2k3 dc >> >> >> > Luit >> >> >> > >> >> >> > "Mathieu CHATEAU" wrote: >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> Hello, >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> sounds to me a network problem, like duplex mismatch. >> >> >> >> does nestat -e indicate a lot of errors ? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> In your mail, is the test from the same server ? >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Cordialement, >> >> >> >> Mathieu CHATEAU >> >> >> >> http://lordoftheping.blogspot.com >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> "Luit" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message >> >> >> >> news:F29FB0C2-BF9C-44F1-B610-(E-Mail Removed)... >> >> >> >> > Hi >> >> >> >> > I am having problems with slow copy of files from one w2003 >> >> >> >> > (R2) >> >> >> >> > server >> >> >> >> > to >> >> >> >> > another. I have a domain with 1 w2k domain controller and a >> >> >> >> > new >> >> >> >> > w2003 >> >> >> >> > dc >> >> >> >> > which will replace the w2k dc. further more 2 terminal servers >> >> >> >> > (w2k) >> >> >> >> > and 2 >> >> >> >> > w2003 terminal servers which will replace the old w2k servers. >> >> >> >> > When coping about 250 Mb from the w2003 fileserver to one of >> >> >> >> > the >> >> >> >> > w2003 >> >> >> >> > servers (dc or ts) it takes about 168 minutes to copy. When >> >> >> >> > copying >> >> >> >> > from >> >> >> >> > the >> >> >> >> > w2003 fileserver to a w2k ts it takes about 8 minutes. >> >> >> >> > Browsing >> >> >> >> > is >> >> >> >> > slow >> >> >> >> > and >> >> >> >> > programs started from the fileserver share do not start, but >> >> >> >> > the >> >> >> >> > executables >> >> >> >> > remain in memory. >> >> >> >> > Anyone can help? >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> > Thanks >> >> >> >> > Luit >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|
| |
|
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| slow copy performance from WinXP client | Po | Windows Networking | 0 | 11-09-2007 03:03 AM |
| Slow file copy performance over LAN between two Windows 2003 Serve | Adie | Windows Networking | 4 | 06-17-2007 10:36 PM |
| Slow file copy performance to DC - but what if we move? | Jonas Back | Windows Networking | 0 | 02-28-2006 02:06 PM |
| Slow File Copy Performance Between XP Clients & 2003 Server | Ben | Windows Networking | 11 | 06-15-2005 10:22 PM |
| Slow performance when copy data within the share | Mathias Ljungsten | Windows Networking | 0 | 03-04-2004 10:10 AM |
Linear Mode
