The most economical thing I have seen is cellphone based systems by Sprint
and Verison. We purchased the Verizon system and it gets over 700kb
download speed and over 200kb upload speed by testing with
www.speakeasy.net/speedtest .
We are using the USB based device "USB720".
We are an NBC affiated TV Station and use it for reporters to use with a
laptop at remote locations to get on the Net and VPN back into the station
to run the Newsroon System to put in their stories. We are also working on
using the same device with our Satelite Uplink Truck that has a rack mounted
PC built into the truck.
As with any wireless technology,..the signal strength directly effects the
speed. Too low a signal can cause it to drop the connection. But in
practice we have had pretty good luck with it so far.
I'm guessing the cost is around $70 a month,..but I'm not the one that pays
the bill.
--
Phillip Windell
www.wandtv.com
The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------
Understanding the ISA 2004 Access Rule Processing
http://www.isaserver.org/articles/IS...cessRules.html
Troubleshooting Client Authentication on Access Rules in ISA Server 2004
http://download.microsoft.com/downlo...7/ts_rules.doc
Microsoft Internet Security & Acceleration Server: Partners
http://www.microsoft.com/isaserver/partners/default.asp
Microsoft ISA Server Partners: Partner Hardware Solutions
http://www.microsoft.com/forefront/e...epartners.mspx
-----------------------------------------------------
"Mike Webb" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:OsfR%(E-Mail Removed)...
> We are in a remote rural area - remote in that we can't get landline (DSL,
> T1, etc.) without prohibitive cost, and tree lines prevent access to the
> wireless internet towers in the area - who uses, by default, satellite.
> This is okay, but we'd like better. The Fair Use Policy we have of a max
> of 17GB download per 30-day rolling average is killing us.
>
> I've heard of NLOS (non-line-of-sight) wireless, and there's even a
> company nearby that offers it -- we're too far from their coverage
> however. Anyone know of new technologies/capabilities that could help
> rural users like us, either now or in the (near) future?
>
> --
> Mike Webb
> Platte River Whooping Crane Maintenance Trust, Inc.
> a 501 (c)(3) conservation non-profit organization
>