Colin Wilson wrote:
>>> ...you could go with Pipex - less speed, costs more.
>> But what's the support like? That is what is going to be the make
>> or break of a lot of the cheaper ISPs...
>
> They have no tangible support any more.
>
> When I was trying to leave them, the only time I got a positive
> response was when I emailed the director and chairman direct.
>
> Before that point, I was lied to, had my account put into a closure
> state "in error", delayed, and so on.
>
> This was nothing new.
>
> When they rehashed their users' webspace 12-18 months ago, they
> fucked it up - partly because they didn't tell anyone the new FTP
> server details, while leaving the old ones active for "updating"
> (but this did not update the live site) - ignoring support requests
> for over two months on the subject.
>
> My departure was a combination of *really* bad connectivity that I
> could *prove* was their fault, being overpriced (I was paying
> £23.44/month for a 1Mbit line), non-existant support, and a refusal
> to allow me to alter my account to a higher speed without a 12 month
> contract.
>
> * using individual.net it would take 20+ minutes to download the
> days' headers from 20 groups - many had zero traffic or <50 posts
> per day - clicking on a post to read it would result in a wait of
> ~5 mins, and very regular disconnections (leading to yet more 20
> minute waits for the headers) - often before the last lot of
> headers had downloaded from the previously dropped connection.
>
> - and they *still* fucking billed me when I was out of contract a
> month later than I should have been due to their incompetence.
>
> I'm now with Sky - yes, their email (webmail in particular) is
> laughable, but it's been no less reliable that Pipex had been of
> late, and i'm getting 6-7Mbit connections for £13.44 less per month.
You know what, reading your post gave me strange feeling of deja vu as
it very closely follows my experience with the ISP you are now
satisfied with...
|