I started getting errors when trying to send e-mails through Sky's
SMTP server yesterday (5th Feb 2008) and rang Sky's tech support line.
They informed me that all their e-mail server settings had changed and
I need to update the settings (which can be found on their website).
Fair enough - so I did that and still got errors. The errors were...
- None of the authentication methods supported by this client are
suported by your server
- The server responded 530 5.7.0...
- 503 Valid RCPT command must precede DATA
On ringing them again I had a conversation that went like this:
ME: "I understand I need to change my SMTP settings in Outlook, which
I've done, according to instructions on your website, but am still
getting errors"
THEM: "We've had a lot of complaints about this. What you need to do
is phone up Outlook"
ME: "Phone Outlook? How can I do that?"
THEM: "The error is with Outlook not us, so you need to phone them"
ME: "Outlook is an application on my computer - it doesn't have a
phone number"
.... Then a lengthy argument which ended in a more 'senior' technician
telling me actually I need to phone MICROSOFT, not Outlook.
Unbelievable.
Finally after trawling the web I managed to find some more useful
info. Because I use a different provider for my incoming mail and just
use Sky for outgoing, it was more awkward. In this situation, it seems
you need to...
- Set up the facility to send using a different (non Sky) e-mail
address in the Sky webmail interface:
http://mysky.sky.com/portal/site/sky...icleId=2674110
- Follow the instructions here for setting up the correct ports and
authentication, etc for the OUTGOING mail:
http://mysky.sky.com/portal/site/sky...cleId=11297903
- But ignore the settings for the incoming mail, which need to remain
as they are. I noticed also that their requirement for your username
has changed - from previously being everything BEFORE the @ sign of
your e-mail address, to now being the entire e-mail address (i.e.
including the @sky.com).
Now works again, without any phonecalls to Outlook necessary.
On 6 Feb, 09:34, PeeGee <tries...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> Colin Wilson wrote:
> >> Those people who took the time to manually set up their POP3 andSMTP
> >> access via a mail client would have been sent an e-mail explaining
> >> what changes needed to be made. If they had been tech savy enough to
> >> set up their mail client in the first place, the alterations shouldn't
> >> cause any problems.
>
> > That would have been nice, and despite telling us repeatedly they were
> > looking to move to google mail, I was on holiday for a week when it
> > happened.
>
> > I had less than two days notice (while I was still away) - telling me
> > to change thesettings- of course, I was on holiday, no computer
> > access, and didn't receive it.
>
> > I found on my return that I was unable to get any email - including
> > the one telling me to change thesettings, as they'd already moved
> > platforms to one I could no longer access or get information on as the
> > email was stuck on the new platform...
>
> If you go towww.sky.com/toolsthe e-mail login is, I believe, unchanged
> (it would be a nonsense if it were!). You should then be able to access
> your e-mails (and enable POP3, if required). Note that, unlike most POP3
> based systems, the client cannot delete mail on the host - you have to
> let Google delete it when it's downloaded - a major retrograde step.
>
> This tale, of course, shows the benefits of using a proper e-mail client
> and downloading e-mails onto your own system. I do use web-mail as well,
> as it's the only way to update spam filters on most systems :-(
>
> --
> PeeGee
>
> The reply address is a spam trap. All mail is reported as spam.
> "Nothing should be able to load itself onto a computer without the
> knowledge or consent of the computer user. Software should also be able
> to be removed from a computer easily."
> Peter Cullen, Microsoft Chief Privacy Strategist (Computing 18 Aug 05)- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -