Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Linux Networking > Should the number of compute nodes in cluster be power of 2 ?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Should the number of compute nodes in cluster be power of 2 ?

 
 
alexandre_irrthum@yahoo.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-29-2006, 10:25 PM
Hi everyone,

I'm in the process of building a small high-performance Linux cluster
from PCs. The cluster will have 7 or 8 Pentium 4 compute nodes and will
run Rocks. The cluster will have to run PVM and/or MPI parallel
programs + some job scheduling for non-paralellized code.

Is there any reason to prefer a number of compute nodes which is a
power of 2 (8, 16, ...), e.g. some parallel programs that might run
much more efficiently on 8 nodes rather than 7 ? Obviously, you can
stack 2^n boxes more nicely, and the nodes will fit well on the screen
in the cluster-monitoring application. But are there more fundamental
implications ?

Thanks,

alex

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WLBS - detect number of nodes in cluster? NewCoder Windows Networking 0 01-17-2008 04:13 PM
Our high end SQL server cluster is maxed out, how else to expand? Will it help to move tables off of the cluster onto other clusters or will that just create processing bottleneck on the cluster running SQL server? Daniel Windows Networking 0 07-20-2007 07:02 PM
server adds a separate record to routing table for certain compute Ilya Windows Networking 3 02-14-2006 10:34 PM
Can one create a "bi-directional" heartbeat cluster with 2 nodes? Wayne de Villiers Linux Networking 1 10-26-2003 05:20 PM
Home Lan Network with 1 W2000 computer as Host/server for 2 other W98 SE compute Clement Hamer Windows Networking 3 08-30-2003 08:46 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11