Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Windows Networking > should nslookup resolve by using single-labels

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

should nslookup resolve by using single-labels

 
 
durx
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      07-05-2006, 04:50 PM
HI,

Im not sure if nslookup should resolve by using single-labels or not,
but i get mixed results when i run it...

We have 4 child domain sites, some of which can, when from inside
nslookup resolve some of the child domains using the single label; ie
northwest returns same as northwest.rootdomain.internal northeast
returns same as northeast.rootdomain.internal but never returns just
rootdomain, rootdomain.internal works fine.

even from the PDCE (also DNS server) or any other rootdomain server, no
return is given from nslookup without giving the FQDN for the
rootdomain.

all the sites are linked via router to router vpn, and sit in there own
site in sites and services.

The DNS is setup so each domain uses its own AD zone set to replicate
round with secondarys added.

we dont see any sysvol problems, but this maybe stopping our DFSR from
being fault tolerant as it cannot find the rootdomain without the FQDN.

Cheers

Phil

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ping does not resolve, nslookup does, DNS queries end up externall Mike. Windows Networking 3 03-06-2008 06:18 PM
Single xp computer can't connect to a single server groups@brainin.com Windows Networking 0 09-12-2007 10:38 PM
Nslookup succeeds, but ping fails to resolve hostname Curt McNamee Windows Networking 1 11-07-2006 03:04 PM
WPA Ambiguous labels !! RJK Wireless Networks 0 09-30-2006 12:48 PM
Dig and nslookup resolve; ping doesn't Mark Tunnell Linux Networking 1 07-14-2005 07:59 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11