Hate to disagree, but this wording is from Comcast's Acceptable Use Policy:
resell the Service or otherwise make available to anyone outside the
Premises the ability to use the Service (i.e. wi-fi, or other methods of
networking),
So, they specifically ban it.
and this is the result:
These actions include, but are not limited to, temporary or permanent
removal of content, cancellation of newsgroup posts, filtering of Internet
transmissions, and the immediate suspension or termination of all or any
portion of the Service.
You're right, they don't specifically say they will bill your neighbor, it
is actually more onerous -- you agree to not limit their liability in any
way.
Tom
"Ray Bacon" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:j4XZb.3035$(E-Mail Removed)...
> Tom,
>
> Most ISP terms of service do not prohibit sharing your signal. The terms
do
> generally prohibit selling your connectivity, but the average provider
will
> not know that your signal is being shared.
>
> Why would a provider "charge you double" and "ban you." Perhaps a
provider
> would want to charge you for a second user (but not likely), but they
would
> not ban you at the same time they are charging you for mulitple users.
>
> In answer to the original question, a more appropriate response might be
> that sharing one's signal may subject you to risks of inappropriate
> activities (sharing porno files) or excessive bandwidth usage (downloading
> movies for hours at a time) that will attract ISP attention.
>
> -Ray
> "Tom Scales" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> news:Muadnb238pdaQKrdRVn-(E-Mail Removed)...
> > Physically no.
> >
> > That said, most ISPs have terms of service that prohibit it, so if you
get
> > caught, they'll likely try to charge you double and ban you.
> >
> > Tom
> > "Tim" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
> > news:QKQZb.15079$(E-Mail Removed) link.net...
> > > Is there anything keeping neighbors from sharing a DSL internet
> connection
> > > via wireless if so desired?
> > > I assume no.
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
|