Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Computer Networking > Broadband > sharing BB between 2 houses

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

sharing BB between 2 houses

 
 
me
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-05-2006, 06:11 PM
adive please...

i would like to share a broadband connection between 2 house that are around
300 - 400 meters apart....

they have line of sight

i have seen equipment for sale that will transmit over such distances.

does anyone have any experience or knowlege of this kind of set-up ..
would this provide a reliable service or could there be issues with this
kind of set-up

thanx

kev...


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Gordon Henderson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-05-2006, 06:40 PM
In article <dpjr0v$21e$(E-Mail Removed)>,
me <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>adive please...
>
>i would like to share a broadband connection between 2 house that are around
>300 - 400 meters apart....
>
>they have line of sight
>
>i have seen equipment for sale that will transmit over such distances.
>
>does anyone have any experience or knowlege of this kind of set-up ..
>would this provide a reliable service or could there be issues with this
>kind of set-up


WiFi with directional antennae. Preferably proper outdoor units. Maybe
£3-400 for a link, depending on the quality you want (& speed). You can
do it cheaper with indoor units and external antennae, but I've never
had good results doing it that way. (& I've built several wide-area
community broadband networks with various indoor & outdoor WiFi kit over
the years)

There are wireless solutions that go right up to 300Mb/sec, but you gotta
pay for those speeds!

It all depends on your budget and what you expect from it...

Gordon
 
Reply With Quote
 
ato_zee@hotmail.com
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-05-2006, 07:10 PM

On 5-Jan-2006, "me" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:

> i would like to share a broadband connection between 2 house that are around
> 300 - 400 meters apart....
>
> they have line of sight


Can they be physically connected? If so fibre is a strong contender.
10BaseF is rated to 5000 metres, it is possible to pick up part reels
quite cheap, at a pinch a torch can be used to test continuity,
termination is DIY with a steep learning curve, terminating eqpt
whether AUI-FOT or fibre hub expensive, though eBay might come
to the rescue.

Would two USB wireless dongles be within visible distance of each other
(line of sight)? It probably wouldn't work if there are walls and part of a
building in between? If you can look past one and see the other then
set one to Station mode and the other to Infrastructure and see what,
if any, signal strength is reported. If you get a signal, then you can
add reflectors (dish or ali-foil coated card) to boost signal strength
of USB wireless adaptors. A couple of Netgear ME102's might be
worth considering.

There are (expensive) infra-red and microwave links available. The IR
links are an adapatation (of the now down to 3 quid) laser pointing
devices

The main issue is security with a wireless system, and ISP's terms
of service about sharing. If both users are heavy downloaders, or users of
streaming content, then bandwidth sharing becomes an issue.
 
Reply With Quote
 
R. Mark Clayton
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-05-2006, 07:21 PM

<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news(E-Mail Removed)...
>
> On 5-Jan-2006, "me" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
>> i would like to share a broadband connection between 2 house that are
>> around
>> 300 - 400 meters apart....
>>
>> they have line of sight

>
> Can they be physically connected? If so fibre is a strong contender.
> 10BaseF is rated to 5000 metres, it is possible to pick up part reels
> quite cheap, at a pinch a torch can be used to test continuity,
> termination is DIY with a steep learning curve, terminating eqpt
> whether AUI-FOT or fibre hub expensive, though eBay might come
> to the rescue.


Traditional ethernet would go 500m, but can you still get it?

>
> Would two USB wireless dongles be within visible distance of each other
> (line of sight)? It probably wouldn't work if there are walls and part of
> a
> building in between? If you can look past one and see the other then
> set one to Station mode and the other to Infrastructure and see what,
> if any, signal strength is reported. If you get a signal, then you can
> add reflectors (dish or ali-foil coated card) to boost signal strength
> of USB wireless adaptors. A couple of Netgear ME102's might be
> worth considering.


USB dongles won't go 400m, however a card with an external well constructed
aerial might. At 2G4Hz, you can use a parabolic or make your own Yagi.

>
> There are (expensive) infra-red and microwave links available. The IR
> links are an adapatation (of the now down to 3 quid) laser pointing
> devices


Again to go 400m (bidirectional) you will need something a little better
than a defocused board pointer.

>
> The main issue is security with a wireless system, and ISP's terms
> of service about sharing. If both users are heavy downloaders, or users of
> streaming content, then bandwidth sharing becomes an issue.


Just set it up right.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Paul Cummins
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-05-2006, 07:45 PM
In article <dpjv3s$g53$(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) (R. Mark Clayton) wrote:

> USB dongles won't go 400m, however a card with an external well
> constructed aerial might. At 2G4Hz, you can use a parabolic or make
> your own Yagi.


Put a USB at the focus of a "chinese sieve" and it will!

--
Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
Wasting Bandwidth since 1981


 
Reply With Quote
 
Mugwump
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-05-2006, 07:58 PM
In article <dpjv3s$g53$(E-Mail Removed)>,
(E-Mail Removed) says...

<snip>

> Traditional ethernet would go 500m, but can you still get it?
>


<snip>

Max distance for ethernet (10Mb) and fast ethernet (100MB) is 100m. It
may well go that distance but performance will degrade due to increased
risk of collision.
--
Mugwump

Reply to 'usenetmail{at}discworld{dot}org{dot}uk
 
Reply With Quote
 
Brian
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-05-2006, 08:38 PM

"me" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:dpjr0v$21e$(E-Mail Removed)...
> adive please...
>
> i would like to share a broadband connection between 2 house that are
> around 300 - 400 meters apart....
>
> they have line of sight
>
> i have seen equipment for sale that will transmit over such distances.
>
> does anyone have any experience or knowlege of this kind of set-up ..
> would this provide a reliable service or could there be issues with this
> kind of set-up
>
> thanx
>
> kev...
>

Get a wireless router, it's the easiest way to do what you need. Put it in
an upstairs room by a window facing the other house. Then ech buy a
wireless network card. Configure it to only allow the two of you access and
away you go. Use WPA on both computers and lock the MAC addresses to stop
everyone else connecting. The router will easily cover that distance, but
if there are obstructions buy a bigger aerial for the neighbour.
Easy solution.


 
Reply With Quote
 
M
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-05-2006, 08:47 PM
This might be worth looking at http://www.usbwifi.orcon.net.nz/
"Paul Cummins" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> In article <dpjv3s$g53$(E-Mail Removed)>,
> (E-Mail Removed) (R. Mark Clayton) wrote:
>
>> USB dongles won't go 400m, however a card with an external well
>> constructed aerial might. At 2G4Hz, you can use a parabolic or make
>> your own Yagi.

>
> Put a USB at the focus of a "chinese sieve" and it will!
>
> --
> Paul Cummins - Always a NetHead
> Wasting Bandwidth since 1981
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
Ivor Jones
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-05-2006, 08:52 PM


"R. Mark Clayton" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
message
news:dpjv3s$g53$(E-Mail Removed)

[snip]

> Traditional ethernet would go 500m, but can you still get
> it?


Standard 50 ohm RG8 coax (it doesn't *have* to be yellow..!) Easy enough
to get, but the transceiver modules might be a problem. I've seen them
occasionally at amateur radio rallies but in any case the link would be
limited to 10Mb/sec. Ethernet cards with an AUI socket on aren't common
these days either.

Ivor


 
Reply With Quote
 
Ivor Jones
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      01-05-2006, 08:54 PM


"Mugwump" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:8Mfvf.135926$(E-Mail Removed)
> In article
> <dpjv3s$g53$(E-Mail Removed)>,
> (E-Mail Removed) says...
>
> <snip>
>
> > Traditional ethernet would go 500m, but can you still
> > get it?
> >

>
> <snip>
>
> Max distance for ethernet (10Mb) and fast ethernet
> (100MB) is 100m. It may well go that distance but
> performance will degrade due to increased risk of
> collision.


Thin ethernet is limited to 100m but thick (if you can still get the
bits..!) should cover 500m ok. Still limited to 10Mb though.

Ivor


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Network two houses together? mark Home Networking 14 05-07-2005 02:28 PM
Sharing broadband between houses wirelessly. tommynospam@yahoo.com Windows Networking 6 03-25-2005 03:31 PM
54g between houses nick Home Networking 4 02-12-2004 06:58 PM
Installing pci 802.11b nic two houses away Jeremy Davis Wireless Internet 2 07-29-2003 08:28 PM
Re: Sharing Wireless Between Houses -- guidance needed AJ Wireless Internet 23 06-27-2003 07:37 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11