There is not yet any such thing as AP agnostic bridges. Bridging, as well
as repeating, depend upon a feature called Wireless Distribution System
(roaming depends on Distribution System, which may be wireless or wired).
There isn't a ratified standard for a Distribution System, wireless or
otherwise, yet. IEEE 802.11F is now available in draft format. For lack of
a standard, each vendor had to solve the DS problem for themselves. Some
vendors may have collaborated on this, thus providing interoperability.
When 802.11F is ratified, will vendors provide firmware upgrades for
existing equipment, or will only new products follow the standard? Well,
when WPA came out in 6/03 almost no vendors retrofitted their 802.11b
products to support it; even though WPA was specifically designed to work
without requiring more powerful processors or any other hardware
improvements over WEP.
Ron Bandes, CCNP, CTT+, etc.
"gerry" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> [original post is likely clipped to save bandwidth]
> On Mon, 24 May 2004 20:04:27 +0200, Jan Bachman <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>
> >>Thanks for any suggestions or ideas. I'm at a total loss on what to
> >>try next. I've used Linux for years, but I have little experience
> >>with wireless. Plus this is the second card I"ve tried with the first
> >>being a Linksys with same results.
> >Workaround:
> >Consider getting a bridge (e.g. Linksys WET11 or it's sucessor).
> >With a bridge the OS is not important, as there are no drivers needed.
> >Your PC connects to the bridge by common ethernet.
> >
> >/Jan
>
> Be a bit careful when buying bridges. Many will only connects to matched
> access points ort another identical bridge.
>
> I found D-Link bridges horrible in this respect, Netgear are AP agnostic
> (at least mine)
>
> Check compatibility!
>
> gerry
>
> --
>
> Personal home page - http://gogood.com
>
> gerry misspelled in my email address to confuse robots