Networking Forums

Networking Forums > Wireless Networking > Wireless Internet > Set Long Preamble on WRT54G

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Set Long Preamble on WRT54G

 
 
Nemo Oudeheis
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-12-2005, 09:18 PM
Is there a way to set the preamble to long on a WRT54G? I would assume it
would be in the web interface on the Wireless_Advanced page, but I don't see
it.

~TNX


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-13-2005, 04:01 PM
On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:18:03 GMT, "Nemo Oudeheis" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>Is there a way to set the preamble to long on a WRT54G? I would assume it
>would be in the web interface on the Wireless_Advanced page, but I don't see
>it.
>~TNX


I have no idea, but I'm curious as to why you would want to do this.
A long preamble is a left over from 802.11 (1 and 2 mbits/sec), where
the receiver took a long time to synchronize. The preamble is
transmitted with every packet and is ineffecient with airtime. If you
enable long preamble and do a before/after wireless performance test,
you'll find about a -15% reduction in thruput. Unless you have 802.11
(1 or 2Mbits/sec) client radios in your system, there's no need for a
long preamble. The default for most access points is "automagic". It
only enables long preambles when associated with a 1 or 2Mbit/sec
client radio. Some AP's will use a short preamble for 1 and
2Mbits/sec connections, unless it detect decoding errors, which imply
that the client requires the older long preamble.

See:
http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/Secti...le42-page5.php
for details.


--
Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558
 
Reply With Quote
 
Nemo Oudeheis
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-13-2005, 05:25 PM
My reason for doing it was that I was advised to try it by ATT Technical
Support. I thought I might as well at least attempt the experiment before
telling them that they were not being helpful.

I recently acquired an AT&T Plug&Share Ultra 6550G PCI wireless adapter for
one of my desktop systems that had been passed by in my "domestic wireless
buildout". I bought it not because I had any real intention of using its
proprietary 108 Mbps data rate, but because it was quite inexpensive and was
supposed to be compatible with the 802.11g + WPA setup I was using. I had
to upgrade their driver to get the WPA support, which, as usual, forces you
to not use their ATT configuration client, but rather the WinXP Wireless
Zero Configuration.

The card installs fine, and I am able to connect to an 802.11b open access
point in the little coffee shop down the street (it's over 500m away!). But
I cannot connect to my own WRT54G (which works OK with my two laptops). It
looks as though it is unable to negotiate the DHCP transaction with the
router, as the WZC just sits and spins in the "Renewing your IP address"
phase. No addresses ever get assigned.

I'm on WinXP Pro SP2 using WPA-PSK and MAC address filtering. The cards MAC
is in the router's table.

I'm sort of grasping at straws at this point.


"Jeff Liebermann" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Tue, 12 Apr 2005 21:18:03 GMT, "Nemo Oudeheis" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>>Is there a way to set the preamble to long on a WRT54G? I would assume it
>>would be in the web interface on the Wireless_Advanced page, but I don't
>>see
>>it.
>>~TNX

>
> I have no idea, but I'm curious as to why you would want to do this.
> A long preamble is a left over from 802.11 (1 and 2 mbits/sec), where
> the receiver took a long time to synchronize. The preamble is
> transmitted with every packet and is ineffecient with airtime. If you
> enable long preamble and do a before/after wireless performance test,
> you'll find about a -15% reduction in thruput. Unless you have 802.11
> (1 or 2Mbits/sec) client radios in your system, there's no need for a
> long preamble. The default for most access points is "automagic". It
> only enables long preambles when associated with a 1 or 2Mbit/sec
> client radio. Some AP's will use a short preamble for 1 and
> 2Mbits/sec connections, unless it detect decoding errors, which imply
> that the client requires the older long preamble.
>
> See:
> http://www.smallnetbuilder.com/Secti...le42-page5.php
> for details.
>
>
> --
> Jeff Liebermann (E-Mail Removed)
> 150 Felker St #D http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
> Santa Cruz CA 95060 AE6KS 831-336-2558



 
Reply With Quote
 
Jeff Liebermann
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-14-2005, 02:40 AM
On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:25:15 GMT, "Nemo Oudeheis" <(E-Mail Removed)>
wrote:

>My reason for doing it was that I was advised to try it by ATT Technical
>Support. I thought I might as well at least attempt the experiment before
>telling them that they were not being helpful.


Well, permit me to be the 2nd to suspect that AT&T knows not what they
speak. If you were running 1 or 2Mbit/sec instead of 108Mbits/sec,
perhaps a long preamble would be useful.

>I recently acquired an AT&T Plug&Share Ultra 6550G PCI wireless adapter for
>one of my desktop systems that had been passed by in my "domestic wireless
>buildout". I bought it not because I had any real intention of using its
>proprietary 108 Mbps data rate, but because it was quite inexpensive and was
>supposed to be compatible with the 802.11g + WPA setup I was using. I had
>to upgrade their driver to get the WPA support, which, as usual, forces you
>to not use their ATT configuration client, but rather the WinXP Wireless
>Zero Configuration.


It shouldn't really force you do use XP Wireless Zero Config. WPA is
in the device driver, not the admin tools. You can always try to
disable WZC in:
Control Panel -> Admin Something -> Services
It's near the bottom of the list. However, if the AT&T config utility
does not have any way to enter the WPA pass phrase, you're stuck with
using WZC.

>The card installs fine, and I am able to connect to an 802.11b open access
>point in the little coffee shop down the street (it's over 500m away!).


Impressive. The RF part is working.

>But
>I cannot connect to my own WRT54G (which works OK with my two laptops).


Anything odd about the WRT54G? Which hardware version? Are you using
Linksys firmware or some alternative (HyperWRT, Sveasoft, etc).

>It
>looks as though it is unable to negotiate the DHCP transaction with the
>router, as the WZC just sits and spins in the "Renewing your IP address"
>phase. No addresses ever get assigned.


I keep seeing this exact problem on various hardware and software
platforms. If you turn off WEP/WPA encryption, DHCP will deliver a
proper IP address. You can sometimes get it to work with a static
(manually assigned) IP address, netmask, gateway, and DNS server.
However, as soon as encryption is enabled, DHCP fails. Basically WEP
and WPA are failing.

I had this happen a few daze ago with a WRT54G v3.0. The Linksys
clients (WPC54G) had no problems connecting with encryption enabled.
However, the two DLink DWL-G520 PCI cards wouldn't work. Neither
would the DWL-G630 in my laptop. Turn off encryption and no problems.
I was using a Hex WEP key, so it wasn't an ASCII to Hex translation
issue.

I had a spare WRT54G v1.1 router with me loaded with Satori firmware.
I replace the customers shiny new router with my beat up old loaner
and everything worked. DHCP delivered IP's as expected with WEP or
WPA enabled.

I wish I could say that I loaded Satori on the customers WRT54G v3.0
router and everything was wonderful. Instead, the customer wanted to
return his new router and buy one with "factory support". So, I reset
everything, packed it back up, loaned in my junker, and am awaiting
the arrival of a DLink DI-624. Sigh.

I'm still not sure if it's a router problem, or a client problem.

The real problem, in my never humble opinion, is that neither MS
Wireless Zero Config or the usual device drivers offer any form of
connection progress diagnostics. It's almost imposible to assign the
blame to any device, driver, or protocol without proper verbose
diagnostics.

Anyway, try:
1. Turn off encryption temporarily and see if DHCP works.
2. If using WEP, try using a Hex key.
3. Turn off MAC address filtering for now.
4. Set to "open authentication".
5. If ambitious (or desperate), try downloading and installing
Sveasoft Satori firmware..

>I'm on WinXP Pro SP2 using WPA-PSK and MAC address filtering. The cards MAC
>is in the router's table.


Maybe. Windoze does NOT necessarily use the cards hardware MAC
address. It uses whatever it finds in the registry. This is lots of
fun especially on a cloned machine, where Windoze inherits the MAC
address of whatever was in the old machine. Check the MAC address
with the site survey tool and don't rely on what's printed on the
label.

>I'm sort of grasping at straws at this point.


Well, a long preamble is certainly not going to help here.
Temporarily disable all the goodies (encryption, MAC filtering) and
use "open authentication". Put the access point back into a very
basic (default) configuration.

One more clue and anecdote. I had the same problem with a WRT54GS
v1.0 and some Netgear PCMCIA cards. DHCP would only work if
encryption were off. Since there was a SUSE Linux 9.1 server
available, I reconfigured the WRT54GS as an access point instead of a
router, disabled the build in DHCP server, and used the DHCP server in
the Linux box. It worked. However, don't ask me what happened or
why. I didn't have time to test.

Oh yeah, testing. Try downloading the DHCP query tool from:
http://www.weird-solutions.com/download/index.html
It's at the bottom of the list. You do NOT need to have an IP address
assigned to use the query tool as DHCP works with broadcasts.


--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831.336.2558 voice http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
# (E-Mail Removed)
# (E-Mail Removed) AE6KS
 
Reply With Quote
 
Nemo Oudeheis
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-15-2005, 04:26 PM
I'm slow to reply to this message because immediately after I received it I
got another response from AT&T support which urged me to use their utility
to try to iron things out. I started it up, and curiously enough, got it to
come up once and show me a WPA screen. I tried entering the PSK, and the
utility immediately crashed. Going back and forth a few times, disabling
and re-enabling the Wireless Zero Configuration service, I never got their
utility to run again.

Exchanged a few more messages with AT&T support, and then decided to back
out the whole installation and try over, but relying on the XP installation
wizard instead of their installer.

Then I went to the router and disabled MAC filtering and WAP. I was able to
connect to my router in "open" configuration. Then I re-enabled MAC
filtering, and was still able to connect. At this point, while I was
catching my breath, because the machine was connected to the Internet again
for the first time in months, a Windows automatic update started, and I
decided to let it run.

I suppose that was methodologically impure in my "experiment"; but I
thought, what the hey, it might just fix something. When it was done, I
rebooted.

Then I went to the router administration, turned on the WPA again, and tried
connecting. Behold! I will show you a mystery! It just worked. My wheezy
old desktop box is now a full-fledged member of my wireless LAN.

The router is a Linksys WRT54G rev 2, with firmware version 3.01.3. The
AT&T Plug&Share Ultra 6550G PCI wireless adapter has driver version
2.1.3.4. I am staying away from the AT&T utility and using only WZC.

Thanks for your patient help!


"Jeff Liebermann" <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in message
news:(E-Mail Removed)...
> On Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:25:15 GMT, "Nemo Oudeheis" <(E-Mail Removed)>
> wrote:
>
>>My reason for doing it was that I was advised to try it by ATT Technical
>>Support. I thought I might as well at least attempt the experiment before
>>telling them that they were not being helpful.

>
> Well, permit me to be the 2nd to suspect that AT&T knows not what they
> speak. If you were running 1 or 2Mbit/sec instead of 108Mbits/sec,
> perhaps a long preamble would be useful.
>
>>I recently acquired an AT&T Plug&Share Ultra 6550G PCI wireless adapter
>>for
>>one of my desktop systems that had been passed by in my "domestic wireless
>>buildout". I bought it not because I had any real intention of using its
>>proprietary 108 Mbps data rate, but because it was quite inexpensive and
>>was
>>supposed to be compatible with the 802.11g + WPA setup I was using. I had
>>to upgrade their driver to get the WPA support, which, as usual, forces
>>you
>>to not use their ATT configuration client, but rather the WinXP Wireless
>>Zero Configuration.

>
> It shouldn't really force you do use XP Wireless Zero Config. WPA is
> in the device driver, not the admin tools. You can always try to
> disable WZC in:
> Control Panel -> Admin Something -> Services
> It's near the bottom of the list. However, if the AT&T config utility
> does not have any way to enter the WPA pass phrase, you're stuck with
> using WZC.
>
>>The card installs fine, and I am able to connect to an 802.11b open access
>>point in the little coffee shop down the street (it's over 500m away!).

>
> Impressive. The RF part is working.
>
>>But
>>I cannot connect to my own WRT54G (which works OK with my two laptops).

>
> Anything odd about the WRT54G? Which hardware version? Are you using
> Linksys firmware or some alternative (HyperWRT, Sveasoft, etc).
>
>>It
>>looks as though it is unable to negotiate the DHCP transaction with the
>>router, as the WZC just sits and spins in the "Renewing your IP address"
>>phase. No addresses ever get assigned.

>
> I keep seeing this exact problem on various hardware and software
> platforms. If you turn off WEP/WPA encryption, DHCP will deliver a
> proper IP address. You can sometimes get it to work with a static
> (manually assigned) IP address, netmask, gateway, and DNS server.
> However, as soon as encryption is enabled, DHCP fails. Basically WEP
> and WPA are failing.
>
> I had this happen a few daze ago with a WRT54G v3.0. The Linksys
> clients (WPC54G) had no problems connecting with encryption enabled.
> However, the two DLink DWL-G520 PCI cards wouldn't work. Neither
> would the DWL-G630 in my laptop. Turn off encryption and no problems.
> I was using a Hex WEP key, so it wasn't an ASCII to Hex translation
> issue.
>
> I had a spare WRT54G v1.1 router with me loaded with Satori firmware.
> I replace the customers shiny new router with my beat up old loaner
> and everything worked. DHCP delivered IP's as expected with WEP or
> WPA enabled.
>
> I wish I could say that I loaded Satori on the customers WRT54G v3.0
> router and everything was wonderful. Instead, the customer wanted to
> return his new router and buy one with "factory support". So, I reset
> everything, packed it back up, loaned in my junker, and am awaiting
> the arrival of a DLink DI-624. Sigh.
>
> I'm still not sure if it's a router problem, or a client problem.
>
> The real problem, in my never humble opinion, is that neither MS
> Wireless Zero Config or the usual device drivers offer any form of
> connection progress diagnostics. It's almost imposible to assign the
> blame to any device, driver, or protocol without proper verbose
> diagnostics.
>
> Anyway, try:
> 1. Turn off encryption temporarily and see if DHCP works.
> 2. If using WEP, try using a Hex key.
> 3. Turn off MAC address filtering for now.
> 4. Set to "open authentication".
> 5. If ambitious (or desperate), try downloading and installing
> Sveasoft Satori firmware..
>
>>I'm on WinXP Pro SP2 using WPA-PSK and MAC address filtering. The cards
>>MAC
>>is in the router's table.

>
> Maybe. Windoze does NOT necessarily use the cards hardware MAC
> address. It uses whatever it finds in the registry. This is lots of
> fun especially on a cloned machine, where Windoze inherits the MAC
> address of whatever was in the old machine. Check the MAC address
> with the site survey tool and don't rely on what's printed on the
> label.
>
>>I'm sort of grasping at straws at this point.

>
> Well, a long preamble is certainly not going to help here.
> Temporarily disable all the goodies (encryption, MAC filtering) and
> use "open authentication". Put the access point back into a very
> basic (default) configuration.
>
> One more clue and anecdote. I had the same problem with a WRT54GS
> v1.0 and some Netgear PCMCIA cards. DHCP would only work if
> encryption were off. Since there was a SUSE Linux 9.1 server
> available, I reconfigured the WRT54GS as an access point instead of a
> router, disabled the build in DHCP server, and used the DHCP server in
> the Linux box. It worked. However, don't ask me what happened or
> why. I didn't have time to test.
>
> Oh yeah, testing. Try downloading the DHCP query tool from:
> http://www.weird-solutions.com/download/index.html
> It's at the bottom of the list. You do NOT need to have an IP address
> assigned to use the query tool as DHCP works with broadcasts.
>
>
> --
> # Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
> # 831.336.2558 voice http://www.LearnByDestroying.com
> # (E-Mail Removed)
> # (E-Mail Removed) AE6KS



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
preamble in WiMAX karthikbalaguru Broadband 1 09-25-2007 10:23 AM
Can you change Preamble on MN-500? Dylan Broadband Hardware 2 07-02-2004 05:53 PM
Q: Accomodating long preamble on Linksys S.V.Proff Wireless Internet 3 04-17-2004 03:59 AM
Q: Accomodating long preamble on Linksys S.V.Proff Windows Networking 3 04-17-2004 03:59 AM
Short/long preamble problems with Apple Airport<->3Com equipment =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Enrique_Ariz=F3n_Benito?= Wireless Internet 0 08-20-2003 10:22 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11