On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 13:20:37 -0500, DanS
<(E-Mail Removed)> wrote:
>Jeff Liebermann <(E-Mail Removed)> wrote in
>news:(E-Mail Removed) :
>
>> DanS <(E-Mail Removed)> hath wroth:
>>
>>>Is there a specific reason why I never see the Senao/Engenius gear
>>>never recommended here ?
>>
>> Yes. See below.
>>
>>>There are many questions here that the answer could be the
>>>Senao/Engenius equipment. $170 US for an outdoor (supposedly) 400 mW
>>>POE 802.11G bridge with an integrated antenna (8 or 16 dBi) is a
>>>one-piece solution that doesn't involve buying a NEMA box, or
>>>expensive coax, or separate directional antenna.
>>>
>>>Is it THAT bad ?
>>
>> The only products you see mentioned in this newsgroup are products
>> that do *NOT* work. Those are the ones that people are having
>> problems with. If you want to buy something that works, just find
>> something that is never mentioned. I'm sure there are people out
>> there using various products that have no questions, no problems, and
>> no complaints. It's just that we never hear from them.
>So by that logic, it's very good gear.
Possibly. If nobody asks any questions, complains, or violently
denounces the manufacturer, then it's either a workable product that
works the first time, or it's a total disaster which everyone returns
and is then too embarrassed by the experience to comment about it.
Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. This is one of those
odd situations where either extreme yields identical user reactions.
--
# Jeff Liebermann 150 Felker St #D Santa Cruz CA 95060
# 831-336-2558
(E-Mail Removed)
#
http://802.11junk.com (E-Mail Removed)
#
http://www.LearnByDestroying.com AE6KS